PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUCO.L vs. ABN.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUCO.L vs. ABN.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (ABN.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AUCO.L is traded in USD, while ABN.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ABN.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUCO.L achieves a -8.56% return, which is significantly lower than ABN.AS's 13.09% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AUCO.L having a 14.35% annualized return and ABN.AS not far behind at 13.75%.


AUCO.L

1D
-1.44%
1M
-16.15%
YTD
-8.56%
6M
-1.88%
1Y
54.19%
3Y*
46.28%
5Y*
20.71%
10Y*
14.35%

ABN.AS

1D
0.00%
1M
8.74%
YTD
13.09%
6M
14.57%
1Y
53.28%
3Y*
49.03%
5Y*
34.94%
10Y*
13.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUCO.L vs. ABN.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AUCO.L
L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF
-8.56%181.83%17.96%15.02%-14.30%-10.12%21.72%44.14%-10.42%10.00%
ABN.AS
ABN AMRO Bank N.V.
13.09%141.62%13.32%18.45%1.89%58.80%-46.18%-16.55%-22.53%52.66%

Correlation

The correlation between AUCO.L and ABN.AS is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015

0.12

Over the past year, AUCO.L and ABN.AS have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUCO.L vs. ABN.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUCO.L
AUCO.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
AUCO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUCO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUCO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AUCO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUCO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

ABN.AS
ABN.AS Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ABN.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABN.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABN.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ABN.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABN.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUCO.L vs. ABN.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (ABN.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AUCO.LABN.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.31

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

2.52

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.45

7.25

-2.80

AUCO.L vs. ABN.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUCO.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the ABN.AS Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUCO.L and ABN.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AUCO.LABN.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.81

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

1.08

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.39

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.38

-0.18

Drawdowns

AUCO.L vs. ABN.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUCO.L drawdown since its inception was -78.30%, roughly equal to the maximum ABN.AS drawdown of -79.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUCO.L and ABN.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUCO.LABN.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.30%

-79.16%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.80%

-20.12%

-11.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.80%

-22.78%

-9.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.62%

-46.83%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.47%

-79.16%

+24.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.80%

-6.03%

-25.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.79%

-30.27%

-10.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.15%

7.05%

+5.10%

Volatility

AUCO.L vs. ABN.AS - Volatility Comparison

L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) has a higher volatility of 15.14% compared to ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (ABN.AS) at 11.42%. This indicates that AUCO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABN.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUCO.LABN.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.14%

11.42%

+3.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.64%

21.79%

+14.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.89%

28.01%

+17.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.20%

31.72%

+6.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.40%

34.57%

+0.83%

Dividends

AUCO.L vs. ABN.AS - Dividend Comparison

AUCO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ABN.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ABN.AS
ABN AMRO Bank N.V.
4.56%4.33%10.01%9.49%7.19%5.26%0.00%8.63%7.06%4.05%3.99%
AUCO.L
L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AUCO.L and ABN.AS have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUCO.L and ABN.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer