AUAU vs. SGDJ
AUAU (Global X Gold Miners ETF) and SGDJ (Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF) are both Gold funds - AUAU tracks the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index while SGDJ tracks the Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AUAU charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SGDJ.
Performance
AUAU vs. SGDJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUAU achieves a -11.09% return, which is significantly lower than SGDJ's -10.12% return.
AUAU
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -14.50%
- YTD
- -11.09%
- 6M
- -14.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGDJ
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -14.44%
- YTD
- -10.12%
- 6M
- -13.19%
- 1Y
- 67.69%
- 3Y*
- 47.56%
- 5Y*
- 16.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
AUAU vs. SGDJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AUAU Global X Gold Miners ETF | -11.09% | 4.18% |
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | -10.12% | 6.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUAU and SGDJ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUAU vs. SGDJ — Risk / Return Rank
AUAU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SGDJ
AUAU vs. SGDJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Miners ETF (AUAU) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AUAU | SGDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.85 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AUAU vs. SGDJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUAU drawdown since its inception was -35.86%, smaller than the maximum SGDJ drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUAU and SGDJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUAU | SGDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.86% | -59.27% | +23.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -36.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -52.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.32% | -34.47% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.51% | -26.26% | +11.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 14.51% | — |
Volatility
AUAU vs. SGDJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUAU | SGDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 42.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.21% | 51.05% | +1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.21% | 40.94% | +11.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.21% | 40.98% | +11.23% |
AUAU vs. SGDJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUAU has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SGDJ's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
AUAU vs. SGDJ - Dividend Comparison
AUAU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUAU Global X Gold Miners ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | 9.31% | 8.37% | 6.55% | 4.55% | 2.46% | 2.20% | 1.97% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.77% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, AUAU and SGDJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, AUAU is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AUAU is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SGDJ.
SGDJ has the higher dividend yield at 9.31%, compared with 0.00% for AUAU.
AUAU tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index, while SGDJ tracks Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AUAU and 0.50% for SGDJ.
Find the right allocation for AUAU and SGDJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer