AUAU vs. JNUG
AUAU (Global X Gold Miners ETF) and JNUG (Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF) are both Gold funds - AUAU tracks the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index while JNUG tracks the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (200%). Both are passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AUAU charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for JNUG.
Performance
AUAU vs. JNUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUAU achieves a -11.09% return, which is significantly higher than JNUG's -41.12% return.
AUAU
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -14.50%
- YTD
- -11.09%
- 6M
- -14.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JNUG
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- -32.88%
- YTD
- -41.12%
- 6M
- -46.22%
- 1Y
- 57.19%
- 3Y*
- 57.61%
- 5Y*
- 8.86%
- 10Y*
- -28.52%
AUAU vs. JNUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AUAU Global X Gold Miners ETF | -11.09% | 4.18% |
JNUG Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | -41.12% | 12.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUAU and JNUG is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUAU vs. JNUG — Risk / Return Rank
AUAU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JNUG
AUAU vs. JNUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Miners ETF (AUAU) and Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AUAU | JNUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.85 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AUAU vs. JNUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUAU drawdown since its inception was -35.86%, smaller than the maximum JNUG drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUAU and JNUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUAU | JNUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.86% | -99.95% | +64.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -67.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -67.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -76.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.32% | -99.67% | +65.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.51% | -93.89% | +79.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 29.34% | — |
Volatility
AUAU vs. JNUG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUAU | JNUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 40.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 90.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.21% | 104.68% | -52.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.21% | 81.74% | -29.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.21% | 106.71% | -54.50% |
AUAU vs. JNUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUAU has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than JNUG's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
AUAU vs. JNUG - Dividend Comparison
AUAU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JNUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUAU Global X Gold Miners ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JNUG Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | 2.42% | 1.04% | 2.01% | 1.62% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 0.10% | 0.46% | 0.06% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, AUAU and JNUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, AUAU is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AUAU is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for JNUG.
JNUG has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 0.00% for AUAU.
AUAU tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index, while JNUG tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Global X and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AUAU and 1.03% for JNUG.
Find the right allocation for AUAU and JNUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer