AUAU vs. FGDL

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

AUAU (Global X Gold Miners ETF) and FGDL (Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF) are both Gold funds - AUAU tracks the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index while FGDL tracks the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AUAU charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FGDL.

Performance

AUAU vs. FGDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Gold Miners ETF (AUAU) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUAU achieves a -11.09% return, which is significantly lower than FGDL's -6.86% return.

AUAU

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: -14.50%
• YTD: -11.09%
• 6M: -14.39%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FGDL

• 1D: 1.23%
• 1M: -10.34%
• YTD: -6.86%
• 6M: -10.30%
• 1Y: 20.40%
• 3Y*: 27.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUAU vs. FGDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AUAU Global X Gold Miners ETF	-11.09%	4.18%
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF	-6.86%	2.60%

Correlation

The correlation between AUAU and FGDL is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025	0.81

Return for Risk

AUAU vs. FGDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUAU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FGDL

FGDL Risk / Return Rank: 21
FGDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
FGDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
FGDL Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FGDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FGDL Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUAU vs. FGDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Miners ETF (AUAU) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AUAU	FGDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.73	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.07	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.16	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.77	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.15	—

Drawdowns

AUAU vs. FGDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUAU drawdown since its inception was -35.86%, which is greater than FGDL's maximum drawdown of -26.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUAU and FGDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	AUAU	FGDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.86%	-26.48%	-9.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-26.48%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.32%	-25.58%	-8.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.51%	-4.12%	-10.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.51%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AUAU	FGDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.10%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	24.65%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.21%	27.99%	+24.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.21%	19.39%	+32.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.21%	19.39%	+32.82%

AUAU vs. FGDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUAU has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FGDL's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

AUAU vs. FGDL - Dividend Comparison

Neither AUAU nor FGDL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AUAU and FGDL in my portfolio?

AUAU and FGDL have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AUAU or FGDL?

On fees, FGDL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AUAU or FGDL?

FGDL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AUAU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AUAU or FGDL?

AUAU and FGDL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AUAU and FGDL?

AUAU tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index, while FGDL tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: Global X and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AUAU and 0.15% for FGDL.