PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUAU vs. DGP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUAU vs. DGP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Gold Miners ETF (AUAU) and DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUAU achieves a -6.86% return, which is significantly lower than DGP's -5.29% return.


AUAU

1D
-8.34%
1M
-14.13%
YTD
-6.86%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DGP

1D
-7.47%
1M
-16.05%
YTD
-5.29%
6M
-0.28%
1Y
47.81%
3Y*
53.64%
5Y*
28.82%
10Y*
19.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUAU vs. DGP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AUAU and DGP is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025

0.80

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUAU vs. DGP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUAU

DGP
DGP Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
DGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGP Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
DGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGP Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUAU vs. DGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Miners ETF (AUAU) and DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AUAU vs. DGP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AUAUDGPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

0.27

-0.39

Drawdowns

AUAU vs. DGP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUAU drawdown since its inception was -31.20%, smaller than the maximum DGP drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUAU and DGP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUAUDGPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.20%

-75.31%

+44.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.20%

-36.98%

+5.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.89%

-41.09%

+28.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.57%

Volatility

AUAU vs. DGP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUAUDGPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.93%

53.01%

-1.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.93%

38.90%

+13.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.93%

35.11%

+16.82%

AUAU vs. DGP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUAU has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DGP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AUAU vs. DGP - Dividend Comparison

Neither AUAU nor DGP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AUAU and DGP have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AUAU is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AUAU is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DGP.

AUAU and DGP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

AUAU is categorized as Gold, while DGP is Leveraged Commodities. AUAU tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index, while DGP tracks Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (200%). They also come from different issuers: Global X and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AUAU and 0.75% for DGP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUAU and DGP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer