PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUAD.L vs. UC96.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUAD.L vs. UC96.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis (AUAD.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUAD.L achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly higher than UC96.L's 6.54% return.


AUAD.L

1D
-0.77%
1M
0.41%
YTD
10.41%
6M
11.49%
1Y
15.16%
3Y*
9.79%
5Y*
6.87%
10Y*

UC96.L

1D
0.76%
1M
4.51%
YTD
6.54%
6M
6.76%
1Y
19.26%
3Y*
9.16%
5Y*
8.01%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUAD.L vs. UC96.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AUAD.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis
10.41%6.19%3.38%7.37%5.97%8.63%40.70%
UC96.L
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
6.54%3.55%8.94%8.61%1.61%29.15%23.75%

Correlation

The correlation between AUAD.L and UC96.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2020

0.44

AUAD.L vs. UC96.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AUAD.L
UC96.L

Financial Services

43.6%
18.7%

Basic Materials

23.0%
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
4.0%

Real Estate

5.0%

-

Healthcare

4.9%
19.0%

Energy

4.5%
1.9%

Industrials

4.5%
19.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
5.2%

Communication Services

2.0%
4.3%

Utilities

1.7%
0.5%

Technology

1.1%
21.1%

Financial Services

AUAD.L
43.6%
UC96.L
18.7%

Basic Materials

AUAD.L
23.0%
UC96.L
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

AUAD.L
6.1%
UC96.L
4.0%

Real Estate

AUAD.L
5.0%
UC96.L

-

Healthcare

AUAD.L
4.9%
UC96.L
19.0%

Energy

AUAD.L
4.5%
UC96.L
1.9%

Industrials

AUAD.L
4.5%
UC96.L
19.5%

Consumer Defensive

AUAD.L
3.6%
UC96.L
5.2%

Communication Services

AUAD.L
2.0%
UC96.L
4.3%

Utilities

AUAD.L
1.7%
UC96.L
0.5%

Technology

AUAD.L
1.1%
UC96.L
21.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUAD.L vs. UC96.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUAD.L
AUAD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
AUAD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUAD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUAD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
AUAD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUAD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

UC96.L
UC96.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
UC96.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC96.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC96.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
UC96.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC96.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUAD.L vs. UC96.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis (AUAD.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AUAD.LUC96.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.32

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

2.79

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.87

9.08

-4.21

AUAD.L vs. UC96.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUAD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the UC96.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUAD.L and UC96.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AUAD.LUC96.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.80

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.57

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

0.73

+0.24

Drawdowns

AUAD.L vs. UC96.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUAD.L drawdown since its inception was -21.75%, smaller than the maximum UC96.L drawdown of -27.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUAD.L and UC96.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUAD.LUC96.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.75%

-27.20%

+5.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.32%

-6.87%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.75%

-19.43%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.75%

-19.43%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.35%

0.00%

-3.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-4.30%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

2.12%

+1.00%

Volatility

AUAD.L vs. UC96.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis (AUAD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) at 2.93%. This indicates that AUAD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC96.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUAD.LUC96.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

2.93%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.32%

7.52%

+2.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.01%

10.64%

+2.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.83%

14.04%

+2.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

15.94%

+2.39%

AUAD.L vs. UC96.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUAD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than UC96.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

AUAD.L vs. UC96.L - Dividend Comparison

AUAD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than UC96.L's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AUAD.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis
2.91%3.22%3.57%4.16%3.95%2.50%3.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC96.L
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.01%0.01%0.01%0.78%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.01%0.02%0.02%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


AUAD.L and UC96.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UC96.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC96.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for AUAD.L.

AUAD.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while UC96.L is Large Cap Value Equities. AUAD.L tracks MSCI Australia NR USD, while UC96.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for AUAD.L and 0.25% for UC96.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUAD.L and UC96.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer