PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
AUAD.L vs. IBC6.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

AUAD.L vs. IBC6.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis (AUAD.L) and iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE).

AUAD.L and IBC6.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AUAD.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the MSCI Australia NR USD. It was launched on Sep 18, 2017. IBC6.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Australia. It was launched on Jan 22, 2010. Both AUAD.L and IBC6.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

AUAD.L vs. IBC6.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis (AUAD.L) and iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AUAD.L vs. IBC6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AUAD.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis		8.10%6.19%3.38%7.37%5.97%8.63%40.70%
IBC6.DE
iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF		8.12%6.27%3.74%7.86%4.47%9.87%40.39%
Different Trading Currencies

AUAD.L is traded in GBp, while IBC6.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IBC6.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AUAD.L having a 8.10% return and IBC6.DE slightly higher at 8.12%.

AUAD.L

1D
2.07%
1M
-4.90%
YTD
8.10%
6M
7.26%
1Y
19.09%
3Y*
8.28%
5Y*
7.76%
10Y*
—

IBC6.DE

1D
2.33%
1M
-4.37%
YTD
8.12%
6M
7.60%
1Y
19.89%
3Y*
8.39%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis

iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF

Often compared with AUAD.L:
AUAD.L vs. LCAL.LAUAD.L vs. IKOR.LAUAD.L vs. MPXG.LAUAD.L vs. PADV.LAUAD.L vs. KRWL.LAUAD.L vs. PAXJ.LAUAD.L vs. XKS2.L
Often compared with IBC6.DE:
IBC6.DE vs. ENZLIBC6.DE vs. VFEA.DEIBC6.DE vs. VOOIBC6.DE vs. VWCE.DEIBC6.DE vs. VTIBC6.DE vs. FLXI.DEIBC6.DE vs. OP6E.DE

AUAD.L vs. IBC6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUAD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IBC6.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.

IBC6.DE
iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF
AUAD.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis

Return for Risk

AUAD.L vs. IBC6.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
AUAD.L
AUAD.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
AUAD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUAD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUAD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
AUAD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUAD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
IBC6.DE
IBC6.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
IBC6.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBC6.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBC6.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
IBC6.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBC6.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUAD.L vs. IBC6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis (AUAD.L) and iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

AUAD.LIBC6.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.16

1.17

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

1.62

-0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.25

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

2.26

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.27

6.70

-0.43

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AUAD.L vs. IBC6.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUAD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the IBC6.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUAD.L and IBC6.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

AUAD.LIBC6.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

1.17

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.47

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.48

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.37

+0.61

Correlation

The correlation between AUAD.L and IBC6.DE is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

AUAD.L vs. IBC6.DE - Dividend Comparison

AUAD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, while IBC6.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AUAD.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis		2.97%3.22%3.57%4.16%3.95%2.50%3.10%0.00%0.00%
IBC6.DE
iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AUAD.L vs. IBC6.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUAD.L drawdown since its inception was -21.75%, smaller than the maximum IBC6.DE drawdown of -38.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUAD.L and IBC6.DE.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

AUAD.LIBC6.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.75%

-43.64%

+21.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.22%

-13.06%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.75%

-23.12%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-43.64%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.37%

-4.86%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-7.92%

+2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

3.02%

+0.21%

Volatility

AUAD.L vs. IBC6.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis (AUAD.L) is 5.40%, while iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) has a volatility of 5.70%. This indicates that AUAD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBC6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

AUAD.LIBC6.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

5.70%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.03%

10.01%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.76%

16.98%

-0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.01%

16.08%

+0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.44%

18.90%

-0.46%