PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATWYX vs. JGYIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATWYX vs. JGYIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy (ATWYX) and John Hancock Global Shareholder Yield Fund (JGYIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATWYX achieves a 12.24% return, which is significantly lower than JGYIX's 19.04% return. Over the past 10 years, ATWYX has outperformed JGYIX with an annualized return of 12.05%, while JGYIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.22% annualized return.


ATWYX

1D
0.28%
1M
3.96%
YTD
12.24%
6M
13.23%
1Y
29.52%
3Y*
21.14%
5Y*
11.26%
10Y*
12.05%

JGYIX

1D
0.96%
1M
7.10%
YTD
19.04%
6M
20.09%
1Y
33.53%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
13.14%
10Y*
10.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATWYX vs. JGYIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATWYX
AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy
12.24%21.44%18.72%20.55%-18.58%20.45%12.70%25.56%-9.76%23.04%
JGYIX
John Hancock Global Shareholder Yield Fund
19.04%24.13%14.38%11.36%-4.87%17.65%-1.36%20.86%-9.27%16.72%

Correlation

The correlation between ATWYX and JGYIX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2007

0.89

The correlation between ATWYX and JGYIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATWYX vs. JGYIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATWYX
ATWYX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ATWYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATWYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATWYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ATWYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATWYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

JGYIX
JGYIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
JGYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
JGYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATWYX vs. JGYIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy (ATWYX) and John Hancock Global Shareholder Yield Fund (JGYIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATWYXJGYIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.61

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

4.89

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.89

19.83

-5.94

ATWYX vs. JGYIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATWYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the JGYIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATWYX and JGYIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATWYXJGYIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

3.40

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

1.00

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.68

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.48

-0.03

Drawdowns

ATWYX vs. JGYIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATWYX drawdown since its inception was -59.14%, which is greater than JGYIX's maximum drawdown of -46.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATWYX and JGYIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATWYXJGYIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.14%

-46.76%

-12.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.75%

-6.96%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.58%

-11.99%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.21%

-18.97%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.33%

-36.45%

+2.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.99%

-6.77%

-3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.71%

+0.47%

Volatility

ATWYX vs. JGYIX - Volatility Comparison

AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy (ATWYX) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to John Hancock Global Shareholder Yield Fund (JGYIX) at 3.29%. This indicates that ATWYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JGYIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATWYXJGYIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

3.29%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.09%

7.69%

+2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

10.02%

+2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.01%

13.22%

+2.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.76%

14.99%

+1.77%

ATWYX vs. JGYIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATWYX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than JGYIX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

ATWYX vs. JGYIX - Dividend Comparison

ATWYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than JGYIX's 11.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATWYX
AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy
3.93%4.41%2.49%1.84%5.88%5.81%1.23%4.93%5.57%12.93%3.16%7.84%
JGYIX
John Hancock Global Shareholder Yield Fund
11.30%13.30%8.21%4.37%9.51%11.27%2.71%4.81%6.31%2.91%3.19%7.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


ATWYX and JGYIX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATWYX has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to JGYIX (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATWYX dropped -59.14% vs JGYIX's -46.76%.

JGYIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATWYX and JGYIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer