ATVPX vs. ZVNBX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ATVPX (Alger 35 Fund) and ZVNBX (Zevenbergen Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ATVPX returned 15.78%/yr vs 3.31%/yr for ZVNBX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ATVPX charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for ZVNBX.

Performance

ATVPX vs. ZVNBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger 35 Fund (ATVPX) and Zevenbergen Growth Fund (ZVNBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATVPX achieves a 19.42% return, which is significantly higher than ZVNBX's 4.04% return.

ATVPX

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: 8.55%
• YTD: 19.42%
• 6M: 17.52%
• 1Y: 48.29%
• 3Y*: 39.55%
• 5Y*: 15.78%
• 10Y*: —

ZVNBX

• 1D: -1.77%
• 1M: 8.73%
• YTD: 4.04%
• 6M: 1.00%
• 1Y: 6.41%
• 3Y*: 20.82%
• 5Y*: 3.31%
• 10Y*: 16.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATVPX vs. ZVNBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ATVPX Alger 35 Fund	19.42%	32.51%	50.84%	31.41%	-36.36%	10.91%	68.05%	14.00%
ZVNBX Zevenbergen Growth Fund	4.04%	9.93%	34.10%	63.92%	-54.79%	-9.19%	123.87%	8.16%

Correlation

The correlation between ATVPX and ZVNBX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2019	0.89

The correlation between ATVPX and ZVNBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ATVPX vs. ZVNBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATVPX

ATVPX Risk / Return Rank: 54
ATVPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
ATVPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ATVPX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
ATVPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
ATVPX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

ZVNBX

ZVNBX Risk / Return Rank: 5
ZVNBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
ZVNBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
ZVNBX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
ZVNBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
ZVNBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATVPX vs. ZVNBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger 35 Fund (ATVPX) and Zevenbergen Growth Fund (ZVNBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ATVPX	ZVNBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	0.30	+1.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	0.56	+2.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.07	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	0.26	+2.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.28	0.66	+9.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ATVPX vs. ZVNBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATVPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the ZVNBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATVPX and ZVNBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ATVPX	ZVNBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	0.30	+1.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.09	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.47	+0.23

Drawdowns

ATVPX vs. ZVNBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATVPX drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, smaller than the maximum ZVNBX drawdown of -66.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATVPX and ZVNBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATVPX	ZVNBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.35%	-66.30%	+12.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.74%	-26.79%	+10.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.19%	-30.14%	+1.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.35%	-63.28%	+9.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-66.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.94%	-12.23%	+10.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.97%	-19.82%	+1.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.89%	10.37%	-5.48%

Volatility

ATVPX vs. ZVNBX - Volatility Comparison

Alger 35 Fund (ATVPX) and Zevenbergen Growth Fund (ZVNBX) have volatilities of 5.93% and 6.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATVPX	ZVNBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.93%	6.23%	-0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.05%	17.91%	-0.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.35%	23.12%	-0.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.45%	35.51%	-2.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.73%	32.37%	-0.64%

ATVPX vs. ZVNBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATVPX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than ZVNBX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

ATVPX vs. ZVNBX - Dividend Comparison

ATVPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.80%, more than ZVNBX's 1.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ATVPX Alger 35 Fund	17.80%	21.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	36.00%	17.24%	0.17%
ZVNBX Zevenbergen Growth Fund	1.22%	1.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.95%	0.07%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ATVPX and ZVNBX in my portfolio?

ATVPX and ZVNBX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ATVPX or ZVNBX?

ZVNBX has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to ATVPX (5.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATVPX dropped -53.35% vs ZVNBX's -66.30%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ATVPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.