PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATVPX vs. RYGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATVPX vs. RYGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger 35 Fund (ATVPX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATVPX achieves a 21.12% return, which is significantly lower than RYGRX's 30.14% return.


ATVPX

1D
-0.55%
1M
10.76%
YTD
21.12%
6M
20.54%
1Y
52.31%
3Y*
40.21%
5Y*
16.42%
10Y*

RYGRX

1D
0.92%
1M
11.15%
YTD
30.14%
6M
30.55%
1Y
37.82%
3Y*
25.67%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
13.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATVPX vs. RYGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ATVPX
Alger 35 Fund
21.12%32.51%50.84%31.41%-36.36%10.91%68.05%14.00%
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
30.14%11.00%25.73%5.80%-28.71%26.61%26.34%17.38%

Correlation

The correlation between ATVPX and RYGRX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2019

0.86

The correlation between ATVPX and RYGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATVPX vs. RYGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATVPX
ATVPX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ATVPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATVPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATVPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ATVPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATVPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

RYGRX
RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATVPX vs. RYGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger 35 Fund (ATVPX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATVPXRYGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.35

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

3.53

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.96

13.56

-2.60

ATVPX vs. RYGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATVPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the RYGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATVPX and RYGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATVPXRYGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.00

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.47

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.44

+0.27

Drawdowns

ATVPX vs. RYGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATVPX drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, roughly equal to the maximum RYGRX drawdown of -54.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATVPX and RYGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATVPXRYGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.35%

-54.22%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.74%

-11.17%

-5.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.19%

-24.95%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.35%

-36.57%

-16.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

0.00%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.98%

-9.41%

-8.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.89%

2.91%

+1.98%

Volatility

ATVPX vs. RYGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alger 35 Fund (ATVPX) is 5.64%, while Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that ATVPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATVPXRYGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

6.39%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.99%

16.30%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.33%

19.71%

+2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.45%

23.50%

+9.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.74%

22.88%

+8.86%

ATVPX vs. RYGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATVPX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than RYGRX's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

ATVPX vs. RYGRX - Dividend Comparison

ATVPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.55%, more than RYGRX's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATVPX
Alger 35 Fund
17.55%21.25%0.00%0.00%0.02%36.00%17.24%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
3.91%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.81%4.43%12.10%7.15%6.26%0.05%2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


ATVPX and RYGRX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYGRX has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to ATVPX (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATVPX dropped -53.35% vs RYGRX's -54.22%.

ATVPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATVPX and RYGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer