PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATRFX vs. CLPAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATRFX vs. CLPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I (ATRFX) and Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATRFX achieves a -2.88% return, which is significantly lower than CLPAX's 7.57% return. Over the past 10 years, ATRFX has underperformed CLPAX with an annualized return of 5.35%, while CLPAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.01% annualized return.


ATRFX

1D
0.87%
1M
-2.15%
6M
2.30%
YTD
-2.88%
1Y
9.45%
3Y*
-1.32%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*
5.35%
ALL TIME*
4.55%

CLPAX

1D
1.76%
1M
-3.34%
6M
6.47%
YTD
7.57%
1Y
15.02%
3Y*
12.20%
5Y*
5.95%
10Y*
7.01%
ALL TIME*
5.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ATRFX vs. CLPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATRFX
Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I
-2.88%2.81%-4.14%24.60%-4.33%25.70%15.32%29.25%-19.65%2.00%
CLPAX
Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund
7.57%12.32%11.42%35.92%-30.54%13.11%5.25%19.41%-3.65%8.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ATRFX and CLPAX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2014

0.31

Over the past year, ATRFX and CLPAX have become more correlated (0.75) than their long-term average of 0.31, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATRFX vs. CLPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ATRFX
ATRFX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
ATRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
ATRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

CLPAX
CLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ATRFX vs. CLPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I (ATRFX) and Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATRFXCLPAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.14

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

0.96

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.06

2.42

-1.36

ATRFX vs. CLPAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATRFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the CLPAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATRFX and CLPAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATRFX vs. CLPAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATRFX drawdown since its inception was -35.17%, which is greater than CLPAX's maximum drawdown of -32.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATRFX and CLPAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATRFXCLPAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.17%

-32.47%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.53%

-12.87%

-9.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.17%

-18.37%

-16.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.17%

-32.47%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.17%

-32.47%

-2.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.16%

-8.58%

-8.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.85%

-8.04%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.84%

5.09%

+2.75%

Volatility

ATRFX vs. CLPAX - Volatility Comparison

Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I (ATRFX) and Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX) have volatilities of 4.49% and 4.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATRFXCLPAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

4.33%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.52%

12.12%

+5.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.45%

15.44%

+6.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

16.16%

+1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

14.55%

+1.14%

ATRFX vs. CLPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATRFX has a 1.77% expense ratio, which is higher than CLPAX's 1.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

ATRFX vs. CLPAX - Dividend Comparison

ATRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than CLPAX's 8.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATRFX
Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I
0.36%0.65%11.89%1.87%4.98%5.43%20.92%1.60%1.37%0.00%0.91%1.02%
CLPAX
Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund
8.46%9.10%0.00%0.00%2.68%0.32%0.49%5.41%0.30%0.02%0.00%17.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


ATRFX and CLPAX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATRFX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to CLPAX (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATRFX dropped -35.17% vs CLPAX's -32.47%.

CLPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATRFX and CLPAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer