PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATRFX vs. SCSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATRFX vs. SCSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I (ATRFX) and Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund (SCSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATRFX achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly higher than SCSPX's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, ATRFX has outperformed SCSPX with an annualized return of 5.97%, while SCSPX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.90% annualized return.


ATRFX

1D
1.68%
1M
3.62%
YTD
0.83%
6M
0.20%
1Y
17.48%
3Y*
-0.12%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
5.97%

SCSPX

1D
0.22%
1M
0.77%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.74%
1Y
5.01%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
0.90%
10Y*
1.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATRFX vs. SCSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATRFX
Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I
0.83%2.81%-4.14%24.60%-4.33%25.70%15.32%29.25%-19.65%2.00%
SCSPX
Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund
0.42%7.61%2.38%4.51%-9.02%-1.05%4.58%6.24%1.49%3.09%

Correlation

The correlation between ATRFX and SCSPX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2014

0.06

The correlation between ATRFX and SCSPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATRFX vs. SCSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATRFX
ATRFX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
ATRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ATRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

SCSPX
SCSPX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SCSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SCSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATRFX vs. SCSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I (ATRFX) and Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund (SCSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATRFXSCSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.25

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

1.73

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.36

4.99

-2.63

ATRFX vs. SCSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATRFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the SCSPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATRFX and SCSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATRFX vs. SCSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATRFX drawdown since its inception was -35.17%, which is greater than SCSPX's maximum drawdown of -13.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATRFX and SCSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATRFXSCSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.17%

-13.41%

-21.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.53%

-2.91%

-19.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.17%

-5.08%

-30.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.17%

-13.41%

-21.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.17%

-13.41%

-21.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.00%

-1.51%

-12.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.79%

-2.16%

-6.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.69%

1.01%

+6.68%

Volatility

ATRFX vs. SCSPX - Volatility Comparison

Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I (ATRFX) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund (SCSPX) at 1.21%. This indicates that ATRFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATRFXSCSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

1.21%

+4.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.91%

2.71%

+15.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.95%

3.62%

+17.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.42%

4.97%

+12.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.60%

3.95%

+11.65%

ATRFX vs. SCSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATRFX has a 1.77% expense ratio, which is higher than SCSPX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

ATRFX vs. SCSPX - Dividend Comparison

ATRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than SCSPX's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATRFX
Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I
0.49%0.65%11.89%1.87%4.98%5.43%20.92%1.60%1.37%0.00%0.91%1.02%
SCSPX
Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund
3.91%3.85%3.60%2.57%2.37%2.05%2.50%2.99%3.19%2.74%2.66%2.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


ATRFX and SCSPX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATRFX has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to SCSPX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATRFX dropped -35.17% vs SCSPX's -13.41%.

SCSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATRFX and SCSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer