PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATO vs. JEPQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATO vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATO achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ's 7.85% return.


ATO

1D
1.03%
1M
-3.15%
YTD
2.53%
6M
2.08%
1Y
13.57%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
10.94%

JEPQ

1D
0.62%
1M
0.68%
YTD
7.85%
6M
8.80%
1Y
26.60%
3Y*
19.91%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATO vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ATO
Atmos Energy Corporation
2.53%23.07%23.35%6.17%1.34%
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
7.85%15.18%24.85%36.28%-11.16%

Correlation

The correlation between ATO and JEPQ is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022

0.14

The correlation between ATO and JEPQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATO vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATO
ATO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ATO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATO Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ATO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

JEPQ
JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATO vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATOJEPQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.40

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

2.91

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.99

13.84

-10.85

ATO vs. JEPQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATO Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the JEPQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATO and JEPQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATO vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATO drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATO and JEPQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATOJEPQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.94%

-20.07%

-31.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.58%

-8.82%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.87%

-20.07%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.11%

-1.64%

-9.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.56%

-3.41%

-5.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

1.85%

+2.33%

Volatility

ATO vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison

Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 4.98%. This indicates that ATO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATOJEPQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

4.98%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.25%

10.22%

+1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.54%

12.61%

+2.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.59%

16.73%

+1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.24%

16.73%

+4.51%

Dividends

ATO vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison

ATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than JEPQ's 10.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATO
Atmos Energy Corporation
2.28%2.15%2.36%2.61%2.48%2.44%2.46%1.92%2.14%2.14%2.31%2.52%
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
10.22%10.53%9.65%10.03%9.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ATO and JEPQ have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATO has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to JEPQ (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATO dropped -51.94% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.

JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATO and JEPQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer