ATO vs. JEPQ
ATO (Atmos Energy Corporation) is a stock, while JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Over the past 3 years, ATO returned 15.86%/yr vs 19.91%/yr for JEPQ. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ATO vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATO achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ's 7.85% return.
ATO
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 13.57%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 10.94%
JEPQ
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 7.85%
- 6M
- 8.80%
- 1Y
- 26.60%
- 3Y*
- 19.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ATO vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATO Atmos Energy Corporation | 2.53% | 23.07% | 23.35% | 6.17% | 1.34% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 7.85% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -11.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATO and JEPQ is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | 0.14 |
The correlation between ATO and JEPQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATO vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank
ATO
JEPQ
ATO vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATO | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.40 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 2.91 | -1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.99 | 13.84 | -10.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATO vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATO drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATO and JEPQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATO | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.94% | -20.07% | -31.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.58% | -8.82% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.87% | -20.07% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.11% | -1.64% | -9.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.56% | -3.41% | -5.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.18% | 1.85% | +2.33% |
Volatility
ATO vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison
Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 4.98%. This indicates that ATO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATO | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 4.98% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.25% | 10.22% | +1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.54% | 12.61% | +2.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.59% | 16.73% | +1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.24% | 16.73% | +4.51% |
Dividends
ATO vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison
ATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than JEPQ's 10.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATO Atmos Energy Corporation | 2.28% | 2.15% | 2.36% | 2.61% | 2.48% | 2.44% | 2.46% | 1.92% | 2.14% | 2.14% | 2.31% | 2.52% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.22% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATO and JEPQ have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATO has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to JEPQ (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATO dropped -51.94% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.
JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATO and JEPQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer