ATO.PA vs. SGLN.L
ATO.PA (Atos SE) is a stock, while SGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Over the past 10 years, ATO.PA returned -38.20%/yr vs 12.07%/yr for SGLN.L. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
ATO.PA vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ATO.PA is traded in EUR, while SGLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLN.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATO.PA achieves a -30.88% return, which is significantly lower than SGLN.L's -0.78% return. Over the past 10 years, ATO.PA has underperformed SGLN.L with an annualized return of -38.20%, while SGLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.07% annualized return.
ATO.PA
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- -7.02%
- YTD
- -30.88%
- 6M
- -37.24%
- 1Y
- -11.08%
- 3Y*
- -67.66%
- 5Y*
- -61.40%
- 10Y*
- -38.20%
SGLN.L
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -9.12%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 6M
- -0.22%
- 1Y
- 24.14%
- 3Y*
- 26.25%
- 5Y*
- 18.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.07%
ATO.PA vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATO.PA Atos SE | -30.88% | 92.96% | -95.04% | -21.77% | -75.90% | -50.00% | 0.62% | 40.05% | -41.10% | 21.05% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -0.78% | 45.64% | 34.39% | 9.51% | 6.07% | 3.50% | 13.41% | 21.93% | 3.07% | -2.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATO.PA and SGLN.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATO.PA vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
ATO.PA
SGLN.L
ATO.PA vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atos SE (ATO.PA) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATO.PA | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.20 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 1.09 | -1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 3.30 | -3.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATO.PA vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATO.PA drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, which is greater than SGLN.L's maximum drawdown of -47.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATO.PA and SGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATO.PA | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.84% | -47.83% | -52.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.73% | -22.06% | -24.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.93% | -22.06% | -76.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.71% | -22.06% | -77.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.84% | -22.06% | -77.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.53% | -19.86% | -79.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.43% | -22.39% | -17.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.93% | 7.25% | +18.68% |
Volatility
ATO.PA vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
Atos SE (ATO.PA) has a higher volatility of 15.77% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) at 6.60%. This indicates that ATO.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATO.PA | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.77% | 6.60% | +9.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.62% | 20.87% | +21.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.09% | 23.81% | +36.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 126.50% | 21.94% | +104.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.38% | 18.08% | +74.30% |
Dividends
ATO.PA vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ATO.PA nor SGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ATO.PA and SGLN.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ATO.PA and SGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer