ATO.PA vs. LUNR
ATO.PA (Atos SE) and LUNR (Intuitive Machines Inc. ) are both stocks. ATO.PA operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while LUNR operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, ATO.PA returned -67.66%/yr vs 38.97%/yr for LUNR. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ATO.PA vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ATO.PA is traded in EUR, while LUNR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LUNR values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATO.PA achieves a -30.88% return, which is significantly lower than LUNR's 66.54% return.
ATO.PA
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- -7.02%
- YTD
- -30.88%
- 6M
- -37.24%
- 1Y
- -11.08%
- 3Y*
- -67.66%
- 5Y*
- -61.40%
- 10Y*
- -38.20%
LUNR
- 1D
- -13.05%
- 1M
- -24.45%
- YTD
- 66.54%
- 6M
- 125.68%
- 1Y
- 144.87%
- 3Y*
- 38.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ATO.PA vs. LUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATO.PA Atos SE | -30.88% | 92.96% | -95.04% | -21.77% | -75.90% | -9.25% |
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc. | 66.54% | -21.23% | 657.68% | -75.22% | 10.16% | -0.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATO.PA and LUNR is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATO.PA vs. LUNR — Risk / Return Rank
ATO.PA
LUNR
ATO.PA vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atos SE (ATO.PA) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATO.PA | LUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.26 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 3.51 | -3.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 7.30 | -7.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATO.PA vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATO.PA drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, roughly equal to the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATO.PA and LUNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATO.PA | LUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.84% | -97.51% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.73% | -41.47% | -5.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.93% | -78.55% | -20.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.53% | -70.24% | -29.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.43% | -64.29% | +24.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.93% | 19.92% | +6.01% |
Volatility
ATO.PA vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Atos SE (ATO.PA) is 15.77%, while Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a volatility of 42.39%. This indicates that ATO.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATO.PA | LUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.77% | 42.39% | -26.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.62% | 92.71% | -50.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.09% | 110.59% | -50.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 126.50% | 171.45% | -44.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.38% | 171.45% | -79.07% |
Dividends
ATO.PA vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison
Neither ATO.PA nor LUNR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ATO.PA vs. LUNR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atos SE and Intuitive Machines Inc. . You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ATO.PA and LUNR have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ATO.PA and LUNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer