ATO.PA vs. CUKX.L
ATO.PA (Atos SE) is a stock, while CUKX.L (iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF) is fund fund tracking the FTSE 100 Index. Over the past 10 years, ATO.PA returned -38.20%/yr vs 8.90%/yr for CUKX.L. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ATO.PA vs. CUKX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ATO.PA is traded in EUR, while CUKX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CUKX.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATO.PA achieves a -30.88% return, which is significantly lower than CUKX.L's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, ATO.PA has underperformed CUKX.L with an annualized return of -38.20%, while CUKX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.90% annualized return.
ATO.PA
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- -9.21%
- YTD
- -30.88%
- 6M
- -37.24%
- 1Y
- -6.04%
- 3Y*
- -67.66%
- 5Y*
- -61.40%
- 10Y*
- -38.20%
CUKX.L
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 11.90%
- 1Y
- 19.92%
- 3Y*
- 14.86%
- 5Y*
- 11.63%
- 10Y*
- 8.90%
ATO.PA vs. CUKX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATO.PA Atos SE | -30.88% | 92.96% | -95.04% | -21.77% | -75.90% | -50.00% | 0.62% | 40.05% | -41.10% | 21.05% |
CUKX.L iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF | 8.19% | 19.22% | 14.57% | 10.00% | -0.44% | 25.12% | -16.10% | 24.68% | -10.17% | 8.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATO.PA and CUKX.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2010 | 0.37 |
The correlation between ATO.PA and CUKX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (3 years) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATO.PA vs. CUKX.L — Risk / Return Rank
ATO.PA
CUKX.L
ATO.PA vs. CUKX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atos SE (ATO.PA) and iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATO.PA | CUKX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.30 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 2.52 | -2.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 8.98 | -9.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATO.PA vs. CUKX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATO.PA drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, which is greater than CUKX.L's maximum drawdown of -39.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATO.PA and CUKX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATO.PA | CUKX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.84% | -39.95% | -59.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.73% | -7.87% | -38.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.93% | -15.82% | -83.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.71% | -15.82% | -83.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.84% | -39.95% | -59.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.53% | -1.58% | -97.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.43% | -6.07% | -33.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.93% | 2.21% | +23.72% |
Volatility
ATO.PA vs. CUKX.L - Volatility Comparison
Atos SE (ATO.PA) has a higher volatility of 15.77% compared to iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) at 3.86%. This indicates that ATO.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CUKX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATO.PA | CUKX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.77% | 3.86% | +11.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.62% | 10.08% | +32.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.09% | 11.95% | +48.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 126.50% | 13.98% | +112.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.38% | 16.79% | +75.59% |
Dividends
ATO.PA vs. CUKX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ATO.PA nor CUKX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ATO.PA and CUKX.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ATO.PA and CUKX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer