PortfoliosLab logo
CJ.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CJ.TO and SRU-UN.TO is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CJ.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cardinal Energy Ltd. (CJ.TO) and SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CJ.TO:

-0.03

SRU-UN.TO:

1.19

Sortino Ratio

CJ.TO:

0.15

SRU-UN.TO:

1.82

Omega Ratio

CJ.TO:

1.02

SRU-UN.TO:

1.21

Calmar Ratio

CJ.TO:

-0.02

SRU-UN.TO:

0.79

Martin Ratio

CJ.TO:

-0.17

SRU-UN.TO:

3.95

Ulcer Index

CJ.TO:

7.35%

SRU-UN.TO:

4.84%

Daily Std Dev

CJ.TO:

30.50%

SRU-UN.TO:

16.19%

Max Drawdown

CJ.TO:

-97.53%

SRU-UN.TO:

-68.25%

Current Drawdown

CJ.TO:

-41.72%

SRU-UN.TO:

-4.68%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CJ.TO:

CA$993.36M

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$4.37B

EPS

CJ.TO:

CA$0.70

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$1.44

PE Ratio

CJ.TO:

8.84

SRU-UN.TO:

17.79

PS Ratio

CJ.TO:

1.98

SRU-UN.TO:

4.50

PB Ratio

CJ.TO:

1.09

SRU-UN.TO:

0.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

CJ.TO:

CA$591.59M

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$930.46M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CJ.TO:

CA$344.12M

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$553.57M

EBITDA (TTM)

CJ.TO:

CA$147.33M

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$228.80M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CJ.TO achieves a -1.13% return, which is significantly lower than SRU-UN.TO's 6.18% return. Over the past 10 years, CJ.TO has underperformed SRU-UN.TO with an annualized return of -2.70%, while SRU-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 5.06% annualized return.


CJ.TO

YTD

-1.13%

1M

3.17%

6M

-0.22%

1Y

-0.96%

3Y*

-4.11%

5Y*

75.24%

10Y*

-2.70%

SRU-UN.TO

YTD

6.18%

1M

1.88%

6M

4.11%

1Y

19.14%

3Y*

2.93%

5Y*

12.89%

10Y*

5.06%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Cardinal Energy Ltd.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CJ.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CJ.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CJ.TO is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CJ.TO is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CJ.TO is 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CJ.TO is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CJ.TO is 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CJ.TO is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

SRU-UN.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SRU-UN.TO is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SRU-UN.TO is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SRU-UN.TO is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SRU-UN.TO is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SRU-UN.TO is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SRU-UN.TO is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CJ.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cardinal Energy Ltd. (CJ.TO) and SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CJ.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the SRU-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CJ.TO and SRU-UN.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CJ.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

CJ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.67%, more than SRU-UN.TO's 7.10% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CJ.TO
Cardinal Energy Ltd.
11.67%11.11%11.46%4.99%0.00%3.66%5.77%17.79%8.25%3.96%9.56%5.27%
SRU-UN.TO
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust
7.10%7.36%7.28%6.91%5.75%8.02%5.81%5.72%5.54%5.15%5.34%6.15%

Drawdowns

CJ.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CJ.TO drawdown since its inception was -97.53%, which is greater than SRU-UN.TO's maximum drawdown of -68.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CJ.TO and SRU-UN.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CJ.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Cardinal Energy Ltd. (CJ.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.21% compared to SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO) at 3.35%. This indicates that CJ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRU-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CJ.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cardinal Energy Ltd. and SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20212022202320242025
150.93M
229.34M
(CJ.TO) Total Revenue
(SRU-UN.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

CJ.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cardinal Energy Ltd. and SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
62.6%
59.6%
(CJ.TO) Gross Margin
(SRU-UN.TO) Gross Margin
CJ.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cardinal Energy Ltd. reported a gross profit of 94.43M and revenue of 150.93M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.6%.

SRU-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 136.79M and revenue of 229.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.6%.

CJ.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cardinal Energy Ltd. reported an operating income of 34.95M and revenue of 150.93M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.

SRU-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 126.26M and revenue of 229.34M, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.

CJ.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cardinal Energy Ltd. reported a net income of 21.40M and revenue of 150.93M, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.

SRU-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of -7.86M and revenue of 229.34M, resulting in a net margin of -3.4%.