CJ.TO vs. CNQ.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Cardinal Energy Ltd. (CJ.TO) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO).
Performance
CJ.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CJ.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CJ.TO Cardinal Energy Ltd. | 24.32% | 48.34% | 14.78% | -8.86% | 87.05% | 420.73% | -68.03% | 24.70% | -52.26% | -48.12% |
CNQ.TO Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 40.30% | 10.42% | 7.11% | 21.06% | 49.65% | 82.41% | -20.75% | 32.78% | -24.17% | 7.75% |
Fundamentals
CJ.TO:
CA$1.70B
CNQ.TO:
CA$135.04B
CJ.TO:
CA$0.13
CNQ.TO:
CA$5.19
CJ.TO:
82.36
CNQ.TO:
12.46
CJ.TO:
3.48
CNQ.TO:
3.25
CJ.TO:
2.04
CNQ.TO:
3.04
CJ.TO:
CA$492.81M
CNQ.TO:
CA$41.51B
CJ.TO:
CA$224.06M
CNQ.TO:
CA$12.51B
CJ.TO:
CA$205.23M
CNQ.TO:
CA$18.36B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CJ.TO achieves a 24.32% return, which is significantly lower than CNQ.TO's 40.30% return. Over the past 10 years, CJ.TO has underperformed CNQ.TO with an annualized return of 9.62%, while CNQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.00% annualized return.
CJ.TO
- 1D
- -6.68%
- 1M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- 24.32%
- 6M
- 40.74%
- 1Y
- 78.81%
- 3Y*
- 26.32%
- 5Y*
- 41.99%
- 10Y*
- 9.62%
CNQ.TO
- 1D
- -4.75%
- 1M
- 7.67%
- YTD
- 40.30%
- 6M
- 49.30%
- 1Y
- 51.36%
- 3Y*
- 25.86%
- 5Y*
- 33.14%
- 10Y*
- 20.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CJ.TO vs. CNQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CJ.TO
CNQ.TO
CJ.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cardinal Energy Ltd. (CJ.TO) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CJ.TO | CNQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.32 | 1.66 | +0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.73 | 2.19 | +0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.30 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 2.60 | +0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.44 | 8.44 | +5.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CJ.TO | CNQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 1.66 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 1.11 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | 0.53 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.63 | -0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between CJ.TO and CNQ.TO is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CJ.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
CJ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%, more than CNQ.TO's 3.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CJ.TO Cardinal Energy Ltd. | 6.79% | 8.29% | 11.11% | 11.46% | 4.99% | 0.00% | 3.66% | 5.77% | 17.79% | 8.25% | 3.97% | 9.58% |
CNQ.TO Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 3.70% | 5.06% | 4.82% | 4.26% | 6.12% | 3.66% | 5.44% | 3.50% | 3.98% | 2.40% | 2.15% | 3.02% |
Drawdowns
CJ.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CJ.TO drawdown since its inception was -97.53%, which is greater than CNQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -76.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CJ.TO and CNQ.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CJ.TO | CNQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.53% | -76.20% | -21.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.47% | -20.44% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.20% | -33.11% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.79% | -76.20% | -19.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.42% | -6.94% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.57% | -18.95% | -34.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.52% | 6.30% | -0.78% |
Volatility
CJ.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
Cardinal Energy Ltd. (CJ.TO) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO) have volatilities of 9.53% and 9.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CJ.TO | CNQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.53% | 9.33% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.81% | 19.80% | +2.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.10% | 31.06% | +3.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.84% | 30.17% | +10.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.42% | 37.89% | +17.53% |
Financials
CJ.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cardinal Energy Ltd. and Canadian Natural Resources Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CJ.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Profitability Comparison
CJ.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cardinal Energy Ltd. reported a gross profit of 22.68M and revenue of 109.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.8%.
CNQ.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a gross profit of 2.04B and revenue of 9.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.2%.
CJ.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cardinal Energy Ltd. reported an operating income of 14.17M and revenue of 109.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.0%.
CNQ.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported an operating income of 1.79B and revenue of 9.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.
CJ.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cardinal Energy Ltd. reported a net income of -29.92M and revenue of 109.19M, resulting in a net margin of -27.4%.
CNQ.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a net income of 5.30B and revenue of 9.61B, resulting in a net margin of 55.2%.