PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATEYY vs. NVS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATEYY vs. NVS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advantest Corp DRC (ATEYY) and Novartis AG (NVS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATEYY achieves a 38.53% return, which is significantly higher than NVS's 14.40% return. Over the past 10 years, ATEYY has outperformed NVS with an annualized return of 52.65%, while NVS has yielded a comparatively lower 11.14% annualized return.


ATEYY

1D
4.13%
1M
-3.29%
YTD
38.53%
6M
38.14%
1Y
200.38%
3Y*
71.51%
5Y*
50.50%
10Y*
52.65%

NVS

1D
-0.55%
1M
2.22%
YTD
14.40%
6M
18.98%
1Y
30.60%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
14.77%
10Y*
11.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATEYY vs. NVS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATEYY
Advantest Corp DRC
38.53%122.70%68.99%111.43%-33.43%27.37%30.96%176.84%12.51%12.66%
NVS
Novartis AG
14.40%46.95%0.02%16.14%8.06%-3.65%3.34%13.92%5.95%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ATEYY and NVS is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.11

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ATEYY:

$127.67B

NVS:

$293.28B

EPS

ATEYY:

¥520.21

NVS:

$6.99

PE Ratio

ATEYY:

53.89

NVS:

21.90

PEG Ratio

ATEYY:

0.69

NVS:

1.48

PS Ratio

ATEYY:

17.92

NVS:

5.29

PB Ratio

ATEYY:

25.59

NVS:

7.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATEYY:

¥1.14T

NVS:

$56.05B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATEYY:

¥736.09B

NVS:

$42.19B

EBITDA (TTM)

ATEYY:

¥533.69B

NVS:

$22.40B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATEYY vs. NVS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATEYY
ATEYY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ATEYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATEYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATEYY Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ATEYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATEYY Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

NVS
NVS Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
NVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
NVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVS Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATEYY vs. NVS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advantest Corp DRC (ATEYY) and Novartis AG (NVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATEYYNVSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.26

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.07

2.43

+3.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.34

5.88

+10.46

ATEYY vs. NVS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATEYY Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is higher than the NVS Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATEYY and NVS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATEYY vs. NVS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATEYY drawdown since its inception was -56.48%, which is greater than NVS's maximum drawdown of -42.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATEYY and NVS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATEYYNVSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.48%

-42.10%

-14.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.24%

-12.65%

-20.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.70%

-19.95%

-24.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.48%

-20.42%

-36.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.48%

-26.03%

-30.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.76%

-6.46%

-5.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.23%

-10.92%

-3.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.32%

5.23%

+7.09%

Volatility

ATEYY vs. NVS - Volatility Comparison

Advantest Corp DRC (ATEYY) has a higher volatility of 27.35% compared to Novartis AG (NVS) at 7.18%. This indicates that ATEYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATEYYNVSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.35%

7.18%

+20.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.16%

14.96%

+40.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.37%

21.02%

+49.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.29%

18.89%

+34.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.58%

19.64%

+28.94%

Dividends

ATEYY vs. NVS - Dividend Comparison

ATEYY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATEYY
Advantest Corp DRC
0.00%0.11%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.18%1.24%0.00%
NVS
Novartis AG
3.12%2.90%3.84%3.44%3.70%3.86%3.22%3.03%3.47%3.24%3.73%3.10%

Financials

ATEYY vs. NVS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Advantest Corp DRC and Novartis AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B250.00B300.00B350.00B20222023202420252026
334.10B
13.52B
(ATEYY) Total Revenue
(NVS) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ATEYY values in JPY, NVS values in USD

ATEYY vs. NVS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Advantest Corp DRC and Novartis AG over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%20222023202420252026
67.4%
74.4%
Portfolio components
ATEYY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Advantest Corp DRC reported a gross profit of 225.18B and revenue of 334.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.4%.

NVS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novartis AG reported a gross profit of 10.07B and revenue of 13.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

ATEYY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Advantest Corp DRC reported an operating income of 156.38B and revenue of 334.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.8%.

NVS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novartis AG reported an operating income of 4.24B and revenue of 13.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.3%.

ATEYY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Advantest Corp DRC reported a net income of 129.16B and revenue of 334.10B, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.

NVS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novartis AG reported a net income of 3.16B and revenue of 13.52B, resulting in a net margin of 23.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ATEYY and NVS have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATEYY has higher volatility (27.35%) compared to NVS (7.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATEYY dropped -56.48% vs NVS's -42.10%.

ATEYY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATEYY and NVS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer