PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATCL vs. TLDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATCL vs. TLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX Autocallable Income ETF (ATCL) and The Laddered T-Bill ETF (TLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ATCL

1D
0.63%
1M
1.13%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLDR

1D
0.06%
1M
0.37%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATCL vs. TLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ATCL and TLDR is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATCL vs. TLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Autocallable Income ETF (ATCL) and The Laddered T-Bill ETF (TLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ATCL vs. TLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATCL vs. TLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATCL drawdown since its inception was -6.08%, which is greater than TLDR's maximum drawdown of -0.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATCL and TLDR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATCLTLDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.08%

-0.05%

-6.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.74%

-0.01%

-0.73%

Volatility

ATCL vs. TLDR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATCLTLDRDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.87%

0.40%

+7.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.87%

0.40%

+7.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.87%

0.40%

+7.47%

ATCL vs. TLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TLDR's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

ATCL vs. TLDR - Dividend Comparison

ATCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than TLDR's 1.56% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ATCL and TLDR have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TLDR is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TLDR is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ATCL.

ATCL has the higher dividend yield at 4.52%, compared with 1.56% for TLDR.

ATCL is categorized as Derivative Income, while TLDR is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ATCL and 0.20% for TLDR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATCL and TLDR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer