PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATAT vs. TME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATAT vs. TME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT) and Tencent Music Entertainment Group (TME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATAT achieves a -16.93% return, which is significantly higher than TME's -47.99% return.


ATAT

1D
1.74%
1M
-3.48%
6M
-17.43%
YTD
-16.93%
1Y
-6.92%
3Y*
23.76%
5Y*
10Y*

TME

1D
0.34%
1M
-4.10%
6M
-47.45%
YTD
-47.99%
1Y
-53.93%
3Y*
7.36%
5Y*
-6.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATAT vs. TME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ATAT
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited
-16.93%49.78%58.43%-2.92%16.26%
TME
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
-47.99%56.39%27.12%8.82%113.95%

Correlation

The correlation between ATAT and TME is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022

0.34

The correlation between ATAT and TME shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ATAT:

$4.45B

TME:

$13.65B

EPS

ATAT:

CN¥13.16

TME:

CN¥5.49

PE Ratio

ATAT:

16.60

TME:

10.98

PEG Ratio

ATAT:

0.10

TME:

0.27

PS Ratio

ATAT:

2.86

TME:

2.89

PB Ratio

ATAT:

8.23

TME:

1.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATAT:

CN¥10.65B

TME:

CN¥32.50B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATAT:

CN¥4.63B

TME:

CN¥18.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

ATAT:

CN¥2.46B

TME:

CN¥13.20B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATAT vs. TME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATAT
ATAT Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
ATAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATAT Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
ATAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATAT Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

TME
TME Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
TME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TME Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
TME Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
TME Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
TME Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATAT vs. TME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT) and Tencent Music Entertainment Group (TME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATATTMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.75

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

-0.80

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.71

-1.29

+0.58

ATAT vs. TME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is higher than the TME Sharpe Ratio of -1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATAT and TME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATAT vs. TME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATAT drawdown since its inception was -46.91%, smaller than the maximum TME drawdown of -90.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATAT and TME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATATTMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.91%

-90.19%

+43.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.32%

-68.21%

+42.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.96%

-68.21%

+37.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.69%

-70.69%

+47.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.14%

-52.20%

+32.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.87%

42.35%

-30.48%

Volatility

ATAT vs. TME - Volatility Comparison

Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT) and Tencent Music Entertainment Group (TME) have volatilities of 9.00% and 9.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATATTMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.00%

9.14%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.89%

40.96%

-13.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.60%

46.98%

-9.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.52%

59.91%

-1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.52%

56.46%

+2.06%

Dividends

ATAT vs. TME - Dividend Comparison

ATAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than TME's 2.70% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ATAT
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited
2.79%1.98%1.67%0.86%
TME
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
2.70%1.03%1.21%0.00%

Financials

ATAT vs. TME - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited and Tencent Music Entertainment Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
2.79B
7.85B
(ATAT) Total Revenue
(TME) Total Revenue
Values in CNY except per share items

ATAT vs. TME - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited and Tencent Music Entertainment Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
41.4%
44.9%
Portfolio components
ATAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 1.16B and revenue of 2.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.4%.

TME - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Tencent Music Entertainment Group reported a gross profit of 3.52B and revenue of 7.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.9%.

ATAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 568.24M and revenue of 2.79B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.

TME - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Tencent Music Entertainment Group reported an operating income of 2.32B and revenue of 7.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.6%.

ATAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited reported a net income of 460.55M and revenue of 2.79B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.

TME - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Tencent Music Entertainment Group reported a net income of 2.08B and revenue of 7.85B, resulting in a net margin of 26.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ATAT and TME have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TME has higher volatility (9.14%) compared to ATAT (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATAT dropped -46.91% vs TME's -90.19%.

ATAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.22 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATAT and TME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer