ATACX vs. QMLFX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ATACX (ATAC Rotation Fund) and QMLFX (Quantified Market Leaders Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, ATACX returned 8.34%/yr vs 10.58%/yr for QMLFX. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ATACX charges 1.74%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for QMLFX.

Performance

ATACX vs. QMLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ATAC Rotation Fund (ATACX) and Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATACX achieves a 18.32% return, which is significantly lower than QMLFX's 19.70% return. Over the past 10 years, ATACX has underperformed QMLFX with an annualized return of 8.34%, while QMLFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.58% annualized return.

ATACX

• 1D: -1.78%
• 1M: 5.90%
• YTD: 18.32%
• 6M: 15.84%
• 1Y: 28.25%
• 3Y*: 16.15%
• 5Y*: -0.38%
• 10Y*: 8.34%

QMLFX

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 8.23%
• YTD: 19.70%
• 6M: 17.05%
• 1Y: 37.99%
• 3Y*: 13.85%
• 5Y*: 0.70%
• 10Y*: 10.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATACX vs. QMLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ATACX ATAC Rotation Fund	18.32%	18.74%	5.05%	2.10%	-25.80%	-10.55%	72.81%	7.72%	-11.44%	27.03%
QMLFX Quantified Market Leaders Fund	19.70%	0.97%	11.05%	15.04%	-23.59%	13.22%	37.81%	26.08%	-13.48%	16.76%

Correlation

The correlation between ATACX and QMLFX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2013	0.43

The correlation between ATACX and QMLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ATACX vs. QMLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATACX

ATACX Risk / Return Rank: 45
ATACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
ATACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
ATACX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
ATACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
ATACX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

QMLFX

QMLFX Risk / Return Rank: 53
QMLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
QMLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
QMLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
QMLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
QMLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATACX vs. QMLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ATAC Rotation Fund (ATACX) and Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ATACX	QMLFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	1.89	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	2.47	-0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.33	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.80	3.86	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.78	11.38	-1.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ATACX vs. QMLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the QMLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATACX and QMLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ATACX	QMLFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.56	1.89	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02	0.03	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.51	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.42	-0.09

Drawdowns

ATACX vs. QMLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATACX drawdown since its inception was -51.26%, which is greater than QMLFX's maximum drawdown of -36.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATACX and QMLFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATACX	QMLFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.26%	-36.59%	-14.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.34%	-10.07%	+2.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.94%	-27.21%	+8.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.75%	-36.59%	-10.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.26%	-36.59%	-14.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.19%	-1.02%	-9.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.78%	-12.53%	-4.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.85%	3.41%	-0.56%

Volatility

ATACX vs. QMLFX - Volatility Comparison

ATAC Rotation Fund (ATACX) has a higher volatility of 9.73% compared to Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX) at 7.78%. This indicates that ATACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATACX	QMLFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.73%	7.78%	+1.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.90%	14.43%	-0.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.95%	20.56%	-2.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.32%	20.23%	+0.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.49%	20.98%	-0.49%

ATACX vs. QMLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATACX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than QMLFX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

ATACX vs. QMLFX - Dividend Comparison

ATACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than QMLFX's 1.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ATACX ATAC Rotation Fund	1.56%	1.85%	0.92%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	13.13%	0.90%	1.10%	8.15%	0.00%	0.00%
QMLFX Quantified Market Leaders Fund	1.15%	1.37%	0.00%	1.99%	0.00%	26.84%	9.58%	0.00%	15.63%	12.15%	2.22%	1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ATACX and QMLFX in my portfolio?

ATACX and QMLFX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ATACX or QMLFX?

ATACX has higher volatility (9.73%) compared to QMLFX (7.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATACX dropped -51.26% vs QMLFX's -36.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QMLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.