ATACX vs. ABRZX
ATACX (ATAC Rotation Fund) and ABRZX (Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, ATACX returned 8.01%/yr vs 4.61%/yr for ABRZX. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ATACX charges 1.74%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for ABRZX.
Performance
ATACX vs. ABRZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATACX achieves a 13.87% return, which is significantly lower than ABRZX's 18.14% return. Over the past 10 years, ATACX has outperformed ABRZX with an annualized return of 8.01%, while ABRZX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.61% annualized return.
ATACX
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- 13.87%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- 22.98%
- 3Y*
- 13.59%
- 5Y*
- -0.40%
- 10Y*
- 8.01%
ABRZX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- 18.14%
- 6M
- 18.72%
- 1Y
- 24.94%
- 3Y*
- 10.68%
- 5Y*
- 4.19%
- 10Y*
- 4.61%
ATACX vs. ABRZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATACX ATAC Rotation Fund | 13.87% | 18.74% | 5.05% | 2.10% | -25.80% | -10.55% | 72.81% | 7.72% | -11.44% | 27.03% |
ABRZX Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A | 18.14% | 8.20% | 3.14% | 5.97% | -14.96% | 9.36% | 9.20% | 9.43% | -7.01% | 9.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATACX and ABRZX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATACX vs. ABRZX — Risk / Return Rank
ATACX
ABRZX
ATACX vs. ABRZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ATAC Rotation Fund (ATACX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A (ABRZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATACX | ABRZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.52 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 5.92 | -3.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.84 | 19.45 | -12.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATACX vs. ABRZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATACX drawdown since its inception was -51.26%, which is greater than ABRZX's maximum drawdown of -26.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATACX and ABRZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATACX | ABRZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.26% | -26.62% | -24.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.57% | -4.25% | -6.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.94% | -18.28% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.04% | -19.33% | -24.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.26% | -26.62% | -24.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.57% | -2.53% | -11.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.77% | -4.74% | -12.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 1.29% | +2.04% |
Volatility
ATACX vs. ABRZX - Volatility Comparison
ATAC Rotation Fund (ATACX) has a higher volatility of 11.28% compared to Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A (ABRZX) at 3.04%. This indicates that ATACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABRZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATACX | ABRZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.28% | 3.04% | +8.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.42% | 8.18% | +8.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.73% | 9.27% | +10.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 12.25% | +8.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.68% | 10.92% | +9.76% |
ATACX vs. ABRZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATACX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ABRZX's 1.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
ATACX vs. ABRZX - Dividend Comparison
ATACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than ABRZX's 2.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABRZX Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A | 2.86% | 3.38% | 13.28% | 2.21% | 0.00% | 26.02% | 1.18% | 6.49% | 0.00% | 6.43% | 4.41% | 6.91% |
ATACX ATAC Rotation Fund | 1.62% | 1.85% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 13.13% | 0.90% | 1.10% | 8.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATACX and ABRZX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATACX has higher volatility (11.28%) compared to ABRZX (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATACX dropped -51.26% vs ABRZX's -26.62%.
ABRZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATACX and ABRZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer