QMLFX vs. QTSSX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

QMLFX (Quantified Market Leaders Fund) and QTSSX (Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund) are both mutual funds - QMLFX is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by Advisors Preferred, while QTSSX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Advisors Preferred. Over the past 5 years, QMLFX returned 0.57%/yr vs -3.91%/yr for QTSSX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QMLFX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.56%/yr for QTSSX.

Performance

QMLFX vs. QTSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX) and Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMLFX achieves a 18.90% return, which is significantly higher than QTSSX's 17.70% return.

QMLFX

• 1D: 1.05%
• 1M: 9.25%
• YTD: 18.90%
• 6M: 16.97%
• 1Y: 38.33%
• 3Y*: 13.60%
• 5Y*: 0.57%
• 10Y*: 10.51%

QTSSX

• 1D: 2.71%
• 1M: 12.39%
• YTD: 17.70%
• 6M: 14.66%
• 1Y: 40.42%
• 3Y*: 14.48%
• 5Y*: -3.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMLFX vs. QTSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QMLFX Quantified Market Leaders Fund	18.90%	0.97%	11.05%	15.04%	-23.59%	-2.62%
QTSSX Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund	17.70%	4.10%	13.88%	13.97%	-27.55%	-16.61%

Correlation

The correlation between QMLFX and QTSSX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2021	0.95

The correlation between QMLFX and QTSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QMLFX vs. QTSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMLFX

QMLFX Risk / Return Rank: 52
QMLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
QMLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
QMLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
QMLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
QMLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

QTSSX

QTSSX Risk / Return Rank: 51
QTSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
QTSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
QTSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
QTSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
QTSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMLFX vs. QTSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX) and Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QMLFX	QTSSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	2.02	-0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	2.63	-0.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.34	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.91	3.57	+0.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.54	9.80	+1.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QMLFX vs. QTSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMLFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the QTSSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMLFX and QTSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QMLFX	QTSSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.94	2.02	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03	-0.17	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	-0.03	+0.45

Drawdowns

QMLFX vs. QTSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMLFX drawdown since its inception was -36.59%, smaller than the maximum QTSSX drawdown of -52.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMLFX and QTSSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QMLFX	QTSSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.59%	-52.27%	+15.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.07%	-11.53%	+1.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.21%	-24.77%	-2.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.59%	-52.27%	+15.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-18.37%	+18.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.54%	-35.89%	+23.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.41%	4.20%	-0.79%

Volatility

QMLFX vs. QTSSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX) is 7.62%, while Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) has a volatility of 8.40%. This indicates that QMLFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QMLFX	QTSSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.62%	8.40%	-0.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.34%	14.65%	-0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.52%	20.49%	+0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.23%	22.89%	-2.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.97%	23.65%	-2.68%

QMLFX vs. QTSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMLFX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than QTSSX's 1.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

QMLFX vs. QTSSX - Dividend Comparison

QMLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than QTSSX's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QMLFX Quantified Market Leaders Fund	1.15%	1.37%	0.00%	1.99%	0.00%	26.84%	9.58%	0.00%	15.63%	12.15%	2.22%	1.63%
QTSSX Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund	0.38%	0.45%	0.00%	6.30%	0.19%	3.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QMLFX and QTSSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, QMLFX and QTSSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QMLFX or QTSSX?

QTSSX has higher volatility (8.40%) compared to QMLFX (7.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMLFX dropped -36.59% vs QTSSX's -52.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.