PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AT1S.L vs. SPXP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AT1S.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (AT1S.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AT1S.L achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly lower than SPXP.L's 10.10% return.


AT1S.L

1D
0.09%
1M
0.31%
6M
1.47%
YTD
2.03%
1Y
6.92%
3Y*
10.39%
5Y*
2.11%
10Y*

SPXP.L

1D
-0.46%
1M
-0.34%
6M
9.72%
YTD
10.10%
1Y
-98.79%
3Y*
-74.34%
5Y*
-54.72%
10Y*
-27.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AT1S.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AT1S.L
Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist
2.03%10.47%9.80%1.39%-11.03%3.09%5.25%16.25%-3.05%
SPXP.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.10%-98.90%27.58%20.06%-8.79%31.26%13.90%26.76%-11.15%

Correlation

The correlation between AT1S.L and SPXP.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2018

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AT1S.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AT1S.L
AT1S.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
AT1S.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AT1S.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
AT1S.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AT1S.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
AT1S.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXP.L
SPXP.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AT1S.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (AT1S.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AT1S.LSPXP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

0.49

+0.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

-1.00

+2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.87

-1.23

+9.11

AT1S.L vs. SPXP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AT1S.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AT1S.L and SPXP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AT1S.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AT1S.L drawdown since its inception was -29.25%, smaller than the maximum SPXP.L drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AT1S.L and SPXP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AT1S.LSPXP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.25%

-99.07%

+69.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.63%

-99.07%

+95.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.20%

-99.07%

+94.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.45%

-99.07%

+72.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-98.92%

+98.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-8.68%

+3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

80.35%

-79.47%

Volatility

AT1S.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (AT1S.L) is 0.87%, while Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that AT1S.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPXP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AT1S.LSPXP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

2.93%

-2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.26%

7.90%

-3.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.71%

99.31%

-94.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.57%

46.56%

-36.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.41%

34.90%

-23.49%

AT1S.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AT1S.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

AT1S.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison

AT1S.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%, while SPXP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AT1S.L
Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist
6.00%5.91%6.29%6.12%6.02%4.36%5.31%5.45%1.13%
SPXP.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AT1S.L and SPXP.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for AT1S.L.

AT1S.L is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while SPXP.L is S&P 500. AT1S.L tracks iBoxx USD Contingent Convertible Liquid Developed Market AT1 (8% Issuer Cap) Index, while SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for AT1S.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AT1S.L and SPXP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer