AT1P.L vs. SPXP.L
AT1P.L (Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF Acc) and SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AT1P.L is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx USD Contingent Convertible Liquid Developed Market AT1 (8% Issuer Cap) Index, while SPXP.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AT1P.L returned 3.55%/yr vs -54.72%/yr for SPXP.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AT1P.L charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPXP.L.
Performance
AT1P.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AT1P.L achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly lower than SPXP.L's 10.10% return.
AT1P.L
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- 6M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 1Y
- 7.04%
- 3Y*
- 9.93%
- 5Y*
- 3.55%
- 10Y*
- —
SPXP.L
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 9.72%
- YTD
- 10.10%
- 1Y
- -98.79%
- 3Y*
- -74.34%
- 5Y*
- -54.72%
- 10Y*
- -27.50%
AT1P.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AT1P.L Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF Acc | 2.37% | 3.19% | 12.16% | -3.30% | 1.16% | 4.77% | 4.85% | 14.81% | 1.74% |
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.10% | -98.90% | 27.58% | 20.06% | -8.79% | 31.26% | 13.90% | 26.76% | -6.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between AT1P.L and SPXP.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2018 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AT1P.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank
AT1P.L
SPXP.L
AT1P.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF Acc (AT1P.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AT1P.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.49 | +0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | -1.00 | +3.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.17 | -1.23 | +7.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AT1P.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AT1P.L drawdown since its inception was -22.71%, smaller than the maximum SPXP.L drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AT1P.L and SPXP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AT1P.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.71% | -99.07% | +76.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.31% | -99.07% | +95.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.12% | -99.07% | +89.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.71% | -99.07% | +76.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.73% | -98.92% | +97.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.05% | -8.68% | +4.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.20% | 80.35% | -79.15% |
Volatility
AT1P.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF Acc (AT1P.L) is 1.78%, while Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that AT1P.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPXP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AT1P.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.78% | 2.93% | -1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.41% | 7.90% | -3.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.13% | 99.31% | -93.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.19% | 46.56% | -36.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.44% | 34.90% | -23.46% |
AT1P.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AT1P.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
AT1P.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AT1P.L nor SPXP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AT1P.L and SPXP.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for AT1P.L.
AT1P.L is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while SPXP.L is S&P 500. AT1P.L tracks iBoxx USD Contingent Convertible Liquid Developed Market AT1 (8% Issuer Cap) Index, while SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for AT1P.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.
Find the right allocation for AT1P.L and SPXP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer