PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AT1P.L vs. ICBU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AT1P.L vs. ICBU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF Acc (AT1P.L) and iShares USD Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF (ICBU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AT1P.L is traded in GBp, while ICBU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ICBU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AT1P.L achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly higher than ICBU.L's 0.31% return.


AT1P.L

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.01%
6M
1.16%
YTD
2.37%
1Y
7.63%
3Y*
9.93%
5Y*
3.55%
10Y*

ICBU.L

1D
0.51%
1M
-0.48%
6M
-0.18%
YTD
0.31%
1Y
3.76%
3Y*
4.34%
5Y*
2.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AT1P.L vs. ICBU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AT1P.L
Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF Acc
2.37%3.19%12.16%-3.30%1.16%4.77%4.85%14.81%1.74%
ICBU.L
iShares USD Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF
0.31%0.01%5.93%1.31%1.78%-0.36%3.31%5.86%4.39%

Correlation

The correlation between AT1P.L and ICBU.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2018

0.52

The correlation between AT1P.L and ICBU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AT1P.L vs. ICBU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AT1P.L
AT1P.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
AT1P.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AT1P.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
AT1P.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
AT1P.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
AT1P.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

ICBU.L
ICBU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
ICBU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICBU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICBU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
ICBU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICBU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AT1P.L vs. ICBU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF Acc (AT1P.L) and iShares USD Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF (ICBU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AT1P.LICBU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.10

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

0.75

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.17

2.02

+4.15

AT1P.L vs. ICBU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AT1P.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the ICBU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AT1P.L and ICBU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AT1P.L vs. ICBU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AT1P.L drawdown since its inception was -22.71%, which is greater than ICBU.L's maximum drawdown of -14.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AT1P.L and ICBU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AT1P.LICBU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.71%

-14.43%

-8.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-5.01%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.12%

-8.02%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.71%

-14.43%

-8.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.73%

-2.61%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-5.84%

+1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

1.86%

-0.66%

Volatility

AT1P.L vs. ICBU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF Acc (AT1P.L) is 1.78%, while iShares USD Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF (ICBU.L) has a volatility of 1.89%. This indicates that AT1P.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICBU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AT1P.LICBU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

1.89%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.41%

5.28%

-0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.13%

6.73%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.19%

8.40%

+1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.44%

8.64%

+2.80%

AT1P.L vs. ICBU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AT1P.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ICBU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

AT1P.L vs. ICBU.L - Dividend Comparison

AT1P.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICBU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AT1P.L
Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ICBU.L
iShares USD Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF
4.51%4.21%3.78%2.78%1.93%1.93%2.78%2.93%2.65%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


AT1P.L and ICBU.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ICBU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ICBU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for AT1P.L.

AT1P.L is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while ICBU.L is Corporate Bonds. AT1P.L tracks iBoxx USD Contingent Convertible Liquid Developed Market AT1 (8% Issuer Cap) Index, while ICBU.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for AT1P.L and 0.15% for ICBU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AT1P.L and ICBU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer