PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICBU.L vs. PRIP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ICBU.L vs. PRIP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF (ICBU.L) and Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ICBU.L vs. PRIP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Different Trading Currencies

ICBU.L is traded in USD, while PRIP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PRIP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICBU.L achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly higher than PRIP.L's -1.13% return.


ICBU.L

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
-0.22%
6M
0.90%
1Y
5.08%
3Y*
5.31%
5Y*
1.80%
10Y*

PRIP.L

1D
0.34%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
-1.13%
6M
-4.81%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ICBU.L vs. PRIP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICBU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PRIP.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

ICBU.L vs. PRIP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICBU.L
ICBU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ICBU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICBU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICBU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ICBU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICBU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

PRIP.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICBU.L vs. PRIP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF (ICBU.L) and Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICBU.LPRIP.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.96

ICBU.L vs. PRIP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICBU.LPRIP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

-0.01

+0.62

Correlation

The correlation between ICBU.L and PRIP.L is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ICBU.L vs. PRIP.L - Dividend Comparison

ICBU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, while PRIP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICBU.L
iShares USD Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF
4.45%4.21%3.78%2.77%1.93%1.93%2.78%2.93%2.65%0.44%
PRIP.L
Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ICBU.L vs. PRIP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICBU.L drawdown since its inception was -13.92%, which is greater than PRIP.L's maximum drawdown of -7.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICBU.L and PRIP.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ICBU.LPRIP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.92%

-9.14%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-6.13%

+4.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.82%

-2.82%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

Volatility

ICBU.L vs. PRIP.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ICBU.LPRIP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.89%

7.98%

-4.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.26%

7.98%

-3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.42%

7.98%

-3.56%