PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AT1D.L vs. XYLD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AT1D.L vs. XYLD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (AT1D.L) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D (XYLD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AT1D.L is traded in GBp, while XYLD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XYLD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AT1D.L achieves a 2.72% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD.L's 0.74% return.


AT1D.L

1D
0.16%
1M
0.45%
6M
1.34%
YTD
2.72%
1Y
7.93%
3Y*
10.04%
5Y*
3.61%
10Y*

XYLD.L

1D
0.32%
1M
-0.41%
6M
0.05%
YTD
0.74%
1Y
3.18%
3Y*
4.07%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AT1D.L vs. XYLD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AT1D.L
Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist
2.72%3.15%12.17%-3.30%1.10%4.76%4.84%14.79%-23.76%
XYLD.L
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D
0.74%-1.36%6.72%0.43%2.18%1.29%7.10%9.23%2.02%

Correlation

The correlation between AT1D.L and XYLD.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2018

0.52

The correlation between AT1D.L and XYLD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AT1D.L vs. XYLD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AT1D.L
AT1D.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
AT1D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AT1D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
AT1D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
AT1D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
AT1D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD.L
XYLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
XYLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AT1D.L vs. XYLD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (AT1D.L) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D (XYLD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AT1D.LXYLD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.09

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

0.63

+1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.82

1.77

+5.06

AT1D.L vs. XYLD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AT1D.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the XYLD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AT1D.L and XYLD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AT1D.L vs. XYLD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AT1D.L drawdown since its inception was -27.40%, which is greater than XYLD.L's maximum drawdown of -15.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AT1D.L and XYLD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AT1D.LXYLD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.40%

-15.49%

-11.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.35%

-5.01%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.14%

-8.75%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.70%

-15.49%

-7.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-4.51%

+3.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-5.18%

-3.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

1.80%

-0.61%

Volatility

AT1D.L vs. XYLD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (AT1D.L) is 1.70%, while Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D (XYLD.L) has a volatility of 1.80%. This indicates that AT1D.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XYLD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AT1D.LXYLD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

1.80%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.74%

4.94%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.49%

6.37%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.88%

8.23%

+1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.08%

9.30%

+4.78%

AT1D.L vs. XYLD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AT1D.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD.L's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

AT1D.L vs. XYLD.L - Dividend Comparison

AT1D.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than XYLD.L's 3.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AT1D.L
Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist
5.99%6.07%6.14%6.24%5.79%4.25%5.63%5.59%1.12%
XYLD.L
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D
3.76%3.61%3.34%2.88%6.03%3.88%3.78%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AT1D.L and XYLD.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XYLD.L is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XYLD.L is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for AT1D.L.

AT1D.L is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while XYLD.L is Corporate Bonds. AT1D.L tracks iBoxx USD Contingent Convertible Liquid Developed Market AT1 (8% Issuer Cap) Index, while XYLD.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for AT1D.L and 0.16% for XYLD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AT1D.L and XYLD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer