AT1D.L vs. EMAU.L
AT1D.L (Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist) and EMAU.L (L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - AT1D.L is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx USD Contingent Convertible Liquid Developed Market AT1 (8% Issuer Cap) Index, while EMAU.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan ESG CEMBI Broad Diversified Custom Maturity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AT1D.L returned 10.04%/yr vs 5.11%/yr for EMAU.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AT1D.L charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EMAU.L.
Performance
AT1D.L vs. EMAU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AT1D.L is traded in GBp, while EMAU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMAU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AT1D.L achieves a 2.72% return, which is significantly higher than EMAU.L's 0.82% return.
AT1D.L
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 2.72%
- 1Y
- 7.48%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- —
EMAU.L
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- 6M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 4.34%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AT1D.L vs. EMAU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AT1D.L Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist | 2.72% | 3.15% | 12.17% | -3.30% | 1.10% | 1.67% |
EMAU.L L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.82% | 0.36% | 7.52% | 1.50% | -0.80% | 0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between AT1D.L and EMAU.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021 | 0.55 |
The correlation between AT1D.L and EMAU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AT1D.L vs. EMAU.L — Risk / Return Rank
AT1D.L
EMAU.L
AT1D.L vs. EMAU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (AT1D.L) and L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMAU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AT1D.L | EMAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.12 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 0.90 | +1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.82 | 2.36 | +4.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AT1D.L vs. EMAU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AT1D.L drawdown since its inception was -27.40%, which is greater than EMAU.L's maximum drawdown of -12.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AT1D.L and EMAU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AT1D.L | EMAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.40% | -12.44% | -14.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.35% | -4.84% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.14% | -8.77% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -2.89% | +1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.42% | -4.47% | -3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | 1.86% | -0.67% |
Volatility
AT1D.L vs. EMAU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (AT1D.L) is 1.70%, while L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMAU.L) has a volatility of 2.23%. This indicates that AT1D.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMAU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AT1D.L | EMAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.70% | 2.23% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.74% | 5.39% | -0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.49% | 6.68% | -0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.88% | 8.44% | +1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.08% | 8.44% | +5.64% |
AT1D.L vs. EMAU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AT1D.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than EMAU.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AT1D.L vs. EMAU.L - Dividend Comparison
AT1D.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, while EMAU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AT1D.L Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist | 5.99% | 6.07% | 6.14% | 6.24% | 5.79% | 4.25% | 5.63% | 5.59% | 1.12% |
EMAU.L L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AT1D.L and EMAU.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMAU.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMAU.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for AT1D.L.
AT1D.L is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while EMAU.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. AT1D.L tracks iBoxx USD Contingent Convertible Liquid Developed Market AT1 (8% Issuer Cap) Index, while EMAU.L tracks J.P. Morgan ESG CEMBI Broad Diversified Custom Maturity Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for AT1D.L and 0.35% for EMAU.L.
Find the right allocation for AT1D.L and EMAU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer