ASWC.DE vs. ESGP.DE
ASWC.DE (HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR) and ESGP.DE (Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ASWC.DE is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the EQM Future of Defence Index, while ESGP.DE is a Gold fund tracking the VettaFi Gold Miners Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ASWC.DE returned 36.09%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for ESGP.DE. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ASWC.DE charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ESGP.DE.
Performance
ASWC.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASWC.DE achieves a 13.59% return, which is significantly higher than ESGP.DE's 11.48% return.
ASWC.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 13.59%
- 1Y
- 17.26%
- 3Y*
- 36.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESGP.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- YTD
- 11.48%
- 1Y
- 16.66%
- 3Y*
- 11.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASWC.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ASWC.DE HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR | 13.59% | 38.30% | 39.36% | 14.37% |
ESGP.DE Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF | 11.48% | 5.79% | 12.94% | 2.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASWC.DE and ESGP.DE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2023 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASWC.DE vs. ESGP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ASWC.DE
ESGP.DE
ASWC.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE) and Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASWC.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.25 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 2.65 | -1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.44 | 7.50 | -6.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASWC.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASWC.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.64%, which is greater than ESGP.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASWC.DE and ESGP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASWC.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.64% | -20.50% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.64% | -6.31% | -16.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.64% | -20.50% | -2.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.23% | 0.00% | -8.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.34% | -5.23% | +0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.97% | 2.23% | +9.74% |
Volatility
ASWC.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Volatility Comparison
HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.05% compared to Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) at 2.13%. This indicates that ASWC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASWC.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.05% | 2.13% | +4.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.34% | 8.96% | +7.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.24% | 11.59% | +18.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.90% | 14.44% | +8.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.90% | 14.44% | +8.46% |
ASWC.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASWC.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ESGP.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASWC.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ASWC.DE nor ESGP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ASWC.DE and ESGP.DE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASWC.DE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASWC.DE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ESGP.DE.
ASWC.DE is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while ESGP.DE is Gold. ASWC.DE tracks EQM Future of Defence Index, while ESGP.DE tracks VettaFi Gold Miners Screened Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ASWC.DE and 0.60% for ESGP.DE.
Find the right allocation for ASWC.DE and ESGP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer