ASTX vs. QTJL
ASTX (Tradr 2X Long ASTS Daily ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ASTX returned -42.09% vs 14.88% for QTJL. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ASTX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
ASTX vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASTX achieves a -61.97% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 4.97% return.
ASTX
- 1D
- -15.53%
- 1M
- -39.48%
- 6M
- -77.89%
- YTD
- -61.97%
- 1Y
- -42.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTJL
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- 6M
- 3.87%
- YTD
- 4.97%
- 1Y
- 14.88%
- 3Y*
- 17.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.67%
- 10Y*
- —
ASTX vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ASTX Tradr 2X Long ASTS Daily ETF | -61.97% | 63.68% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 4.97% | 9.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASTX and QTJL is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASTX vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
ASTX
QTJL
ASTX vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long ASTS Daily ETF (ASTX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASTX | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.29 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 2.24 | -2.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.80 | 11.30 | -12.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASTX vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASTX drawdown since its inception was -84.62%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASTX and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASTX | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.62% | -33.40% | -51.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.62% | -6.68% | -77.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.62% | -2.39% | -82.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.33% | -7.78% | -39.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 52.44% | 1.32% | +51.12% |
Volatility
ASTX vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Long ASTS Daily ETF (ASTX) has a higher volatility of 73.52% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 3.81%. This indicates that ASTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASTX | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 73.52% | 3.81% | +69.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 163.21% | 8.24% | +154.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 215.94% | 10.50% | +205.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 215.62% | 20.33% | +195.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 215.62% | 20.27% | +195.35% |
ASTX vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASTX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASTX vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither ASTX nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ASTX and QTJL have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASTX has higher volatility (73.52%) compared to QTJL (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASTX dropped -84.62% vs QTJL's -33.40%.
On 1-year performance, QTJL leads with 14.88% vs -42.09% for ASTX. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 14.88% return vs -42.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for ASTX.
ASTX and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for ASTX and 0.79% for QTJL.
QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASTX and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer