ASTS vs. MCO
ASTS (AST SpaceMobile, Inc.) and MCO (Moody's Corporation) are both stocks. ASTS operates in Communication Equipment (Technology), while MCO operates in Financial Data & Stock Exchanges (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, ASTS returned 46.99%/yr vs 5.33%/yr for MCO. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ASTS vs. MCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASTS achieves a 22.35% return, which is significantly higher than MCO's -10.94% return.
ASTS
- 1D
- 2.41%
- 1M
- -21.65%
- YTD
- 22.35%
- 6M
- 18.99%
- 1Y
- 90.16%
- 3Y*
- 166.40%
- 5Y*
- 46.99%
- 10Y*
- —
MCO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- -10.94%
- 6M
- -11.78%
- 1Y
- -8.95%
- 3Y*
- 10.11%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 18.17%
ASTS vs. MCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASTS AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | 22.35% | 244.22% | 249.92% | 25.10% | -39.29% | -31.73% |
MCO Moody's Corporation | -10.94% | 8.74% | 22.17% | 41.52% | -27.80% | 26.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASTS and MCO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2021 | 0.22 |
The correlation between ASTS and MCO shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ASTS:
$25.83B
MCO:
$80.30B
ASTS:
-$1.78
MCO:
$13.96
ASTS:
285.79
MCO:
10.28
ASTS:
9.71
MCO:
26.82
ASTS:
$84.94M
MCO:
$7.87B
ASTS:
-$22.93M
MCO:
$5.49B
ASTS:
-$536.80M
MCO:
$3.95B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASTS vs. MCO — Risk / Return Rank
ASTS
MCO
ASTS vs. MCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) and Moody's Corporation (MCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASTS | MCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 0.96 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | -0.38 | +2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.51 | -0.78 | +4.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASTS vs. MCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASTS drawdown since its inception was -85.57%, which is greater than MCO's maximum drawdown of -78.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASTS and MCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASTS | MCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.57% | -78.72% | -6.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.70% | -23.61% | -27.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.40% | -24.65% | -43.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.57% | -41.66% | -43.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.23% | -15.68% | -17.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.52% | -17.76% | -22.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.75% | 11.48% | +14.27% |
Volatility
ASTS vs. MCO - Volatility Comparison
AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) has a higher volatility of 40.73% compared to Moody's Corporation (MCO) at 7.86%. This indicates that ASTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASTS | MCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 40.73% | 7.86% | +32.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 83.64% | 22.55% | +61.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 107.94% | 26.71% | +81.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 109.48% | 26.41% | +83.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 111.23% | 27.67% | +83.56% |
Dividends
ASTS vs. MCO - Dividend Comparison
ASTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASTS AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MCO Moody's Corporation | 0.87% | 0.74% | 0.72% | 0.79% | 1.26% | 0.63% | 0.77% | 0.84% | 1.26% | 1.03% | 1.57% | 1.36% |
Financials
ASTS vs. MCO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AST SpaceMobile, Inc. and Moody's Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ASTS and MCO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASTS has higher volatility (40.73%) compared to MCO (7.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASTS dropped -85.57% vs MCO's -78.72%.
ASTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASTS and MCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer