PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASRW.DE vs. PSWD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASRW.DE vs. PSWD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF USD Acc (ASRW.DE) and Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSWD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ASRW.DE is traded in USD, while PSWD.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the PSWD.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASRW.DE achieves a 9.41% return, which is significantly lower than PSWD.DE's 15.12% return.


ASRW.DE

1D
0.12%
1M
4.11%
YTD
9.41%
6M
10.89%
1Y
25.63%
3Y*
20.46%
5Y*
10Y*

PSWD.DE

1D
-0.06%
1M
4.00%
YTD
15.12%
6M
17.43%
1Y
35.16%
3Y*
22.17%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*
12.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASRW.DE vs. PSWD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ASRW.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF USD Acc
9.41%20.73%18.27%21.79%8.82%
PSWD.DE
Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF
15.12%29.42%10.95%16.29%13.35%

Correlation

The correlation between ASRW.DE and PSWD.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2022

0.80

The correlation between ASRW.DE and PSWD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASRW.DE vs. PSWD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASRW.DE
ASRW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ASRW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASRW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASRW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ASRW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASRW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

PSWD.DE
PSWD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PSWD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSWD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSWD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PSWD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSWD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASRW.DE vs. PSWD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF USD Acc (ASRW.DE) and Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSWD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASRW.DEPSWD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.56

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

4.29

-1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.66

17.13

-4.47

ASRW.DE vs. PSWD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASRW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is lower than the PSWD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASRW.DE and PSWD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASRW.DEPSWD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

3.01

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.54

0.59

+0.95

Drawdowns

ASRW.DE vs. PSWD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASRW.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.82%, smaller than the maximum PSWD.DE drawdown of -37.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASRW.DE and PSWD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASRW.DEPSWD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.82%

-37.66%

+20.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.56%

-8.15%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.82%

-14.30%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-0.47%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.02%

-5.71%

+3.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

2.05%

-0.03%

Volatility

ASRW.DE vs. PSWD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF USD Acc (ASRW.DE) is 3.35%, while Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSWD.DE) has a volatility of 3.64%. This indicates that ASRW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSWD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASRW.DEPSWD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.35%

3.64%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.44%

9.04%

+0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

11.62%

+0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.04%

14.96%

-0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.04%

16.36%

-2.32%

ASRW.DE vs. PSWD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASRW.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PSWD.DE's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASRW.DE vs. PSWD.DE - Dividend Comparison

ASRW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSWD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASRW.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSWD.DE
Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF
1.75%2.03%2.27%2.48%2.66%1.92%1.98%2.37%2.56%2.06%1.97%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASRW.DE and PSWD.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASRW.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASRW.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PSWD.DE.

ASRW.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE, while PSWD.DE tracks FTSE RAFI All-World 3000. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ASRW.DE and 0.39% for PSWD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASRW.DE and PSWD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer