ASRW.DE vs. ESAP.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ASRW.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF USD Acc) and ESAP.DE (BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD) are both exchange-traded funds - ASRW.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE, while ESAP.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ASRW.DE returned 20.46%/yr vs 21.99%/yr for ESAP.DE. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

ASRW.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF USD Acc (ASRW.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (ESAP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASRW.DE achieves a 9.41% return, which is significantly lower than ESAP.DE's 10.03% return.

ASRW.DE

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 4.11%
• YTD: 9.41%
• 6M: 10.89%
• 1Y: 25.63%
• 3Y*: 20.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ESAP.DE

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 4.49%
• YTD: 10.03%
• 6M: 10.96%
• 1Y: 27.63%
• 3Y*: 21.99%
• 5Y*: 13.64%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASRW.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ASRW.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF USD Acc	9.41%	20.73%	18.27%	21.79%	8.82%
ESAP.DE BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD	10.03%	17.48%	24.85%	26.98%	4.43%

Correlation

The correlation between ASRW.DE and ESAP.DE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2022	0.88

The correlation between ASRW.DE and ESAP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ASRW.DE vs. ESAP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASRW.DE

ASRW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 66
ASRW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
ASRW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
ASRW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 64
ASRW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
ASRW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 69

ESAP.DE

ESAP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 73
ESAP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
ESAP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ESAP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ESAP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ESAP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASRW.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF USD Acc (ASRW.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (ESAP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ASRW.DE	ESAP.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	2.34	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	3.41	-0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.42	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	3.35	-0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.66	14.32	-1.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ASRW.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASRW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the ESAP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASRW.DE and ESAP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASRW.DE	ESAP.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	2.34	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.54	0.88	+0.66

Drawdowns

ASRW.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASRW.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.82%, smaller than the maximum ESAP.DE drawdown of -34.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASRW.DE and ESAP.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASRW.DE	ESAP.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.82%	-34.23%	+17.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.56%	-8.20%	-0.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.82%	-18.69%	+1.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	-0.56%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.02%	-5.37%	+3.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	1.93%	+0.09%

Volatility

ASRW.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF USD Acc (ASRW.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.35% compared to BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (ESAP.DE) at 3.09%. This indicates that ASRW.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESAP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASRW.DE	ESAP.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.35%	3.09%	+0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.44%	8.58%	+0.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.17%	11.76%	+0.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.04%	16.01%	-1.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.04%	17.99%	-3.95%

ASRW.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ASRW.DE and ESAP.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ASRW.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ASRW.DE nor ESAP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASRW.DE and ESAP.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, ASRW.DE and ESAP.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ASRW.DE or ESAP.DE?

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASRW.DE or ESAP.DE?

ASRW.DE and ESAP.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

What is the main difference between ASRW.DE and ESAP.DE?

ASRW.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while ESAP.DE is S&P 500. ASRW.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE, while ESAP.DE tracks S&P 500 Index.