ASMU vs. XDSQ
ASMU (Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASMU charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.
Performance
ASMU vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ASMU
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- 50.45%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDSQ
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 3.86%
- 1Y
- 15.98%
- 3Y*
- 15.02%
- 5Y*
- 9.80%
- 10Y*
- —
ASMU vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF | 30.81% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 0.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASMU and XDSQ is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASMU vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
ASMU
XDSQ
ASMU vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASMU | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.49 | 0.69 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
ASMU vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASMU drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMU and XDSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASMU | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.79% | -26.06% | -8.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.52% | -4.96% | -8.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.01% | — |
Volatility
ASMU vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASMU | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 95.13% | 10.56% | +84.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.13% | 15.27% | +79.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.13% | 15.10% | +80.03% |
ASMU vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASMU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASMU vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
ASMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF | 0.16% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASMU and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ASMU.
ASMU has the higher dividend yield at 0.16%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ASMU and 0.79% for XDSQ.
Find the right allocation for ASMU and XDSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer