PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASMU vs. XDSQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASMU vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ASMU

1D
2.55%
1M
50.45%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDSQ

1D
0.01%
1M
1.59%
YTD
2.80%
6M
3.86%
1Y
15.98%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
9.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMU vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ASMU and XDSQ is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026

0.62

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASMU vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMU

XDSQ
XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMU vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASMU vs. XDSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASMUXDSQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.49

0.69

+0.80

Drawdowns

ASMU vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMU drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMU and XDSQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASMUXDSQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.79%

-26.06%

-8.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.52%

-4.96%

-8.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

Volatility

ASMU vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASMUXDSQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

95.13%

10.56%

+84.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.13%

15.27%

+79.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.13%

15.10%

+80.03%

ASMU vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASMU vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

ASMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


ASMU and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ASMU.

ASMU has the higher dividend yield at 0.16%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ASMU and 0.79% for XDSQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASMU and XDSQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer