ASMU vs. SPXL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ASMU (Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF) and SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. ASMU is actively managed, while SPXL is passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASMU charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for SPXL.

Performance

ASMU vs. SPXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ASMU

• 1D: -15.64%
• 1M: 14.18%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPXL

• 1D: -4.48%
• 1M: -5.53%
• YTD: 17.21%
• 6M: 13.86%
• 1Y: 62.56%
• 3Y*: 46.39%
• 5Y*: 20.70%
• 10Y*: 30.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMU vs. SPXL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF	34.12%
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF	13.92%

Correlation

The correlation between ASMU and SPXL is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026	0.68

Return for Risk

ASMU vs. SPXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SPXL

SPXL Risk / Return Rank: 49
SPXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SPXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
SPXL Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SPXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
SPXL Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMU vs. SPXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASMU	SPXL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.69	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.15	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.28	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.35	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.57	—

Drawdowns

ASMU vs. SPXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMU drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, smaller than the maximum SPXL drawdown of -76.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMU and SPXL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASMU	SPXL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.79%	-76.86%	+42.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-26.77%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-48.95%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-63.80%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-76.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.64%	-10.44%	-5.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.03%	-16.09%	+4.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.56%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASMU	SPXL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.70%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	29.55%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	104.55%	37.43%	+67.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	104.55%	50.54%	+54.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	104.55%	53.47%	+51.08%

ASMU vs. SPXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXL's 0.84% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASMU vs. SPXL - Dividend Comparison

ASMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than SPXL's 0.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF	0.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF	0.57%	0.69%	0.74%	0.98%	0.32%	0.11%	0.22%	0.84%	1.02%	3.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASMU and SPXL in my portfolio?

ASMU and SPXL have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ASMU or SPXL?

On fees, SPXL is cheaper at 0.84% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASMU or SPXL?

SPXL is cheaper with a 0.84% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ASMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASMU or SPXL?

SPXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.54% for ASMU.

What is the main difference between ASMU and SPXL?

Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ASMU and 0.84% for SPXL.