ASMU vs. QTAP
ASMU (Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASMU charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.
Performance
ASMU vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ASMU
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- 50.45%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTAP
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 14.67%
- 6M
- 15.56%
- 1Y
- 25.59%
- 3Y*
- 21.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- —
ASMU vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF | 30.81% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 13.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASMU and QTAP is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASMU vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
ASMU
QTAP
ASMU vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASMU | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.49 | 0.75 | +0.74 |
Drawdowns
ASMU vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASMU drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMU and QTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASMU | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.79% | -29.44% | -5.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.10% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.52% | -5.04% | -8.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.32% | — |
Volatility
ASMU vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASMU | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 95.13% | 5.56% | +89.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.13% | 18.89% | +76.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.13% | 18.77% | +76.36% |
ASMU vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASMU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASMU vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
ASMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF | 0.16% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASMU and QTAP have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ASMU.
ASMU has the higher dividend yield at 0.16%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ASMU and 0.79% for QTAP.
Find the right allocation for ASMU and QTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer