PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASMU vs. NUGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASMU vs. NUGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ASMU

1D
2.55%
1M
50.45%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NUGT

1D
-6.64%
1M
-4.13%
YTD
-16.05%
6M
-6.29%
1Y
97.46%
3Y*
60.96%
5Y*
16.32%
10Y*
-8.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMU vs. NUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ASMU and NUGT is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026

0.53

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASMU vs. NUGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMU

NUGT
NUGT Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
NUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
NUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMU vs. NUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASMU vs. NUGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASMUNUGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.49

-0.33

+1.82

Drawdowns

ASMU vs. NUGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMU drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, smaller than the maximum NUGT drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMU and NUGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASMUNUGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.79%

-99.97%

+65.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-99.80%

+99.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.52%

-91.52%

+78.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.39%

Volatility

ASMU vs. NUGT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASMUNUGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

75.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

95.13%

90.01%

+5.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.13%

71.96%

+23.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.13%

87.90%

+7.23%

ASMU vs. NUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than NUGT's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASMU vs. NUGT - Dividend Comparison

ASMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than NUGT's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ASMU
Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF
0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares
0.36%0.22%1.79%1.67%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.63%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASMU and NUGT have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASMU is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASMU is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for NUGT.

NUGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.16% for ASMU.

Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ASMU and 1.23% for NUGT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASMU and NUGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer