ASMU vs. NEMG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ASMU (Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF) and NEMG (Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ASMU charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NEMG.

Performance

ASMU vs. NEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU) and Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ASMU

• 1D: -15.64%
• 1M: 14.18%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NEMG

• 1D: -7.98%
• 1M: -20.02%
• YTD: -20.44%
• 6M: -28.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMU vs. NEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF	34.12%
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF	-42.99%

Correlation

The correlation between ASMU and NEMG is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026	0.45

Return for Risk

ASMU vs. NEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU) and Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

ASMU vs. NEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMU drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, smaller than the maximum NEMG drawdown of -57.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMU and NEMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASMU	NEMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.79%	-57.56%	+22.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.64%	-53.44%	+37.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.03%	-23.21%	+11.18%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASMU	NEMG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	104.55%	102.63%	+1.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	104.55%	102.63%	+1.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	104.55%	102.63%	+1.92%

ASMU vs. NEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than NEMG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASMU vs. NEMG - Dividend Comparison

ASMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while NEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF	0.54%
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASMU and NEMG in my portfolio?

ASMU and NEMG have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ASMU or NEMG?

On fees, NEMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASMU or NEMG?

NEMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ASMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASMU or NEMG?

ASMU has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.00% for NEMG.

What is the main difference between ASMU and NEMG?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ASMU and 0.75% for NEMG.