ASMU vs. LULG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ASMU (Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF) and LULG (Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ASMU charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LULG.

Performance

ASMU vs. LULG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ASMU

• 1D: 2.55%
• 1M: 50.45%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LULG

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: -6.81%
• YTD: -68.07%
• 6M: -59.49%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMU vs. LULG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF	30.81%
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF	-53.95%

Correlation

The correlation between ASMU and LULG is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026	0.32

Return for Risk

ASMU vs. LULG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASMU	LULG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.49	-0.86	+2.35

Drawdowns

ASMU vs. LULG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMU drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, smaller than the maximum LULG drawdown of -73.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMU and LULG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASMU	LULG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.79%	-73.18%	+38.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-70.43%	+70.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.52%	-33.45%	+19.93%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASMU	LULG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	95.13%	85.71%	+9.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	95.13%	85.71%	+9.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	95.13%	85.71%	+9.42%

ASMU vs. LULG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than LULG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASMU vs. LULG - Dividend Comparison

ASMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, while LULG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF	0.16%
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASMU and LULG in my portfolio?

ASMU and LULG have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ASMU or LULG?

On fees, LULG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASMU or LULG?

LULG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ASMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASMU or LULG?

ASMU has the higher dividend yield at 0.16%, compared with 0.00% for LULG.

What is the main difference between ASMU and LULG?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ASMU and 0.75% for LULG.