ASMU vs. LINT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ASMU (Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. Both are actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.97% expense ratio.

Performance

ASMU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ASMU

• 1D: 2.55%
• 1M: 50.45%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LINT

• 1D: 9.00%
• 1M: 30.35%
• YTD: 562.84%
• 6M: 362.73%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF	30.81%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	338.84%

Correlation

The correlation between ASMU and LINT is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026	0.47

Return for Risk

ASMU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASMU	LINT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.49	24.05	-22.56

Drawdowns

ASMU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMU drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, smaller than the maximum LINT drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMU and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASMU	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.79%	-49.54%	+14.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-26.55%	+26.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.52%	-20.51%	+6.99%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASMU	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	95.13%	163.04%	-67.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	95.13%	163.04%	-67.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	95.13%	163.04%	-67.91%

ASMU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ASMU and LINT have an expense ratio of 0.97%.

Dividends

ASMU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

ASMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, more than LINT's 0.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF	0.16%	0.00%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.13%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASMU and LINT in my portfolio?

ASMU and LINT have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ASMU or LINT?

Both ETFs have the same 0.97% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASMU or LINT?

ASMU and LINT have the same expense ratio: 0.97% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASMU or LINT?

ASMU has the higher dividend yield at 0.16%, compared with 0.13% for LINT.