ASMU vs. COTG
ASMU (Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. ASMU charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.
Performance
ASMU vs. COTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ASMU
- 1D
- -8.10%
- 1M
- -17.67%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COTG
- 1D
- 2.07%
- 1M
- -12.24%
- 6M
- -10.12%
- YTD
- 6.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASMU vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF | 22.71% |
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | -14.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASMU and COTG is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026 | -0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASMU vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASMU vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASMU drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -32.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMU and COTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASMU | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.79% | -32.16% | -2.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.82% | -30.24% | +4.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.54% | -10.86% | -1.68% |
Volatility
ASMU vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASMU | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 107.45% | 40.94% | +66.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 107.45% | 40.94% | +66.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 107.45% | 40.94% | +66.51% |
ASMU vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASMU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASMU vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison
ASMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, while COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF | 0.59% |
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASMU and COTG have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ASMU.
ASMU has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ASMU and 0.75% for COTG.
Find the right allocation for ASMU and COTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer