ASML vs. RZLV

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) and RZLV (Rezolve AI Ltd) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — ASML in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials, RZLV in Software - Infrastructure. Over the past year, ASML returned 138.89% vs 25.23% for RZLV. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ASML vs. RZLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) and Rezolve AI Ltd (RZLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASML achieves a 74.80% return, which is significantly higher than RZLV's 4.28% return.

ASML

• 1D: -1.89%
• 1M: 17.83%
• YTD: 74.80%
• 6M: 73.02%
• 1Y: 138.89%
• 3Y*: 37.59%
• 5Y*: 22.97%
• 10Y*: 36.00%

RZLV

• 1D: 5.93%
• 1M: 2.29%
• YTD: 4.28%
• 6M: 4.28%
• 1Y: 25.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASML vs. RZLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ASML ASML Holding N.V.	74.80%	56.51%	-25.16%
RZLV Rezolve AI Ltd	4.28%	-32.72%	-64.95%

Correlation

The correlation between ASML and RZLV is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2024	0.23

Fundamentals

EPS ASML : €25.86 RZLV : -$0.59
PS Ratio ASML : 18.51 RZLV : 97.62
Total Revenue (TTM) ASML : €33.69B RZLV : $6.41M
Gross Profit (TTM) ASML : €17.72B RZLV : $6.12M
EBITDA (TTM) ASML : €12.99B RZLV : -$99.67M

Return for Risk

ASML vs. RZLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASML

ASML Risk / Return Rank: 95
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 92
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 96

RZLV

RZLV Risk / Return Rank: 55
RZLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
RZLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
RZLV Omega Ratio Rank: 59
RZLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
RZLV Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASML vs. RZLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) and Rezolve AI Ltd (RZLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASML	RZLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.27	0.22	+3.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.70	1.30	+2.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.14	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.83	0.35	+7.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.08	0.49	+20.59

ASML vs. RZLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASML Sharpe Ratio is 3.27, which is higher than the RZLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASML and RZLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ASML vs. RZLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASML drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, roughly equal to the maximum RZLV drawdown of -89.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASML and RZLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASML	RZLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.00%	-89.63%	-0.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.85%	-72.15%	+54.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.89%	-75.41%	+73.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.12%	-68.62%	+40.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.63%	51.38%	-44.75%

Volatility

ASML vs. RZLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) is 17.27%, while Rezolve AI Ltd (RZLV) has a volatility of 21.94%. This indicates that ASML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RZLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASML	RZLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.27%	21.94%	-4.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.58%	81.38%	-46.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.75%	117.03%	-74.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.44%	144.10%	-101.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.72%	144.10%	-105.38%

Dividends

ASML vs. RZLV - Dividend Comparison

ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, while RZLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASML ASML Holding N.V.	0.47%	0.97%	0.97%	0.86%	1.27%	0.50%	0.50%	1.40%	0.94%	0.64%	0.92%	0.73%
RZLV Rezolve AI Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASML and RZLV in my portfolio?

ASML and RZLV have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ASML or RZLV?

RZLV has higher volatility (21.94%) compared to ASML (17.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASML dropped -90.00% vs RZLV's -89.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.