PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASML vs. IVZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ASML vs. IVZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) and Invesco Ltd. (IVZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASML achieves a 74.80% return, which is significantly higher than IVZ's 11.84% return. Over the past 10 years, ASML has outperformed IVZ with an annualized return of 36.00%, while IVZ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.38% annualized return.


ASML

1D
-1.89%
1M
24.09%
YTD
74.80%
6M
73.02%
1Y
146.81%
3Y*
37.59%
5Y*
22.97%
10Y*
36.00%

IVZ

1D
2.23%
1M
6.64%
YTD
11.84%
6M
11.89%
1Y
106.01%
3Y*
26.94%
5Y*
4.41%
10Y*
5.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASML vs. IVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
74.80%56.51%-7.70%39.91%-30.49%64.13%66.06%93.56%-9.80%56.23%
IVZ
Invesco Ltd.
11.84%56.94%3.02%6.05%-18.71%35.56%3.06%14.91%-52.05%24.67%

Correlation

The correlation between ASML and IVZ is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 1995

0.39

The correlation between ASML and IVZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

ASML:

€25.86

IVZ:

-$0.62

PS Ratio

ASML:

18.51

IVZ:

2.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

ASML:

€33.69B

IVZ:

$6.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ASML:

€17.72B

IVZ:

$2.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

ASML:

€12.99B

IVZ:

$1.38B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASML vs. IVZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASML
ASML Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

IVZ
IVZ Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
IVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASML vs. IVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) and Invesco Ltd. (IVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASMLIVZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.47

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.83

4.57

+3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.08

12.34

+8.74

ASML vs. IVZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASML Sharpe Ratio is 3.27, which is comparable to the IVZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASML and IVZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASML vs. IVZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASML drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, which is greater than IVZ's maximum drawdown of -83.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASML and IVZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASMLIVZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.00%

-83.91%

-6.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.85%

-22.03%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.38%

-36.52%

-8.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.84%

-52.44%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.84%

-79.72%

+22.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-0.20%

-1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.12%

-35.98%

+7.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.63%

8.15%

-1.52%

Volatility

ASML vs. IVZ - Volatility Comparison

ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a higher volatility of 17.27% compared to Invesco Ltd. (IVZ) at 9.80%. This indicates that ASML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASMLIVZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.27%

9.80%

+7.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.58%

25.28%

+9.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.75%

35.17%

+7.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.44%

36.60%

+5.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.72%

39.41%

-0.69%

Dividends

ASML vs. IVZ - Dividend Comparison

ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than IVZ's 2.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.47%0.97%0.97%0.86%1.27%0.50%0.50%1.40%0.94%0.64%0.92%0.73%
IVZ
Invesco Ltd.
2.92%3.18%4.66%6.15%4.07%2.89%4.45%6.84%7.11%3.15%3.66%3.17%

Financials

ASML vs. IVZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ASML Holding N.V. and Invesco Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
8.77B
1.69B
(ASML) Total Revenue
(IVZ) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ASML values in EUR, IVZ values in USD

ASML vs. IVZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ASML Holding N.V. and Invesco Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
53.0%
67.0%
Portfolio components
ASML - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 4.65B and revenue of 8.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.0%.

IVZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Invesco Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.13B and revenue of 1.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.0%.

ASML - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 3.16B and revenue of 8.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.

IVZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Invesco Ltd. reported an operating income of -1.46B and revenue of 1.69B, resulting in an operating margin of -86.2%.

ASML - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.76B and revenue of 8.77B, resulting in a net margin of 31.4%.

IVZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Invesco Ltd. reported a net income of -1.06B and revenue of 1.69B, resulting in a net margin of -62.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ASML and IVZ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASML has higher volatility (17.27%) compared to IVZ (9.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASML dropped -90.00% vs IVZ's -83.91%.

ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 2.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASML and IVZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer