ASML vs. HBAR-USD
ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) is a stock, while HBAR-USD (HederaHashgraph) is a cryptocurrency. Over the past 5 years, ASML returned 22.97%/yr vs -16.92%/yr for HBAR-USD. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ASML vs. HBAR-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASML achieves a 74.80% return, which is significantly higher than HBAR-USD's -26.14% return.
ASML
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 17.61%
- YTD
- 74.80%
- 6M
- 73.02%
- 1Y
- 146.81%
- 3Y*
- 37.59%
- 5Y*
- 22.97%
- 10Y*
- 36.00%
HBAR-USD
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -17.44%
- YTD
- -26.14%
- 6M
- -36.26%
- 1Y
- -50.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.01%
- 5Y*
- -16.92%
- 10Y*
- —
ASML vs. HBAR-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 74.80% | 56.51% | -7.70% | 39.91% | -30.49% | 64.13% | 66.06% | 21.16% |
HBAR-USD HederaHashgraph | -26.14% | -60.44% | 212.23% | 135.51% | -87.44% | 812.76% | 211.49% | -97.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASML and HBAR-USD is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2019 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASML vs. HBAR-USD — Risk / Return Rank
ASML
HBAR-USD
ASML vs. HBAR-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) and HederaHashgraph (HBAR-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASML | HBAR-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 0.93 | +0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.83 | -0.69 | +8.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.08 | -0.98 | +22.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASML vs. HBAR-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASML drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, smaller than the maximum HBAR-USD drawdown of -97.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASML and HBAR-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASML | HBAR-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.00% | -97.58% | +7.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.85% | -73.39% | +55.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.38% | -79.29% | +33.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.84% | -92.79% | +35.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | -84.50% | +82.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.12% | -74.51% | +46.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.63% | 51.80% | -45.17% |
Volatility
ASML vs. HBAR-USD - Volatility Comparison
ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a higher volatility of 17.27% compared to HederaHashgraph (HBAR-USD) at 16.33%. This indicates that ASML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBAR-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASML | HBAR-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.27% | 16.33% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.58% | 43.30% | -8.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.75% | 65.06% | -22.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.44% | 85.17% | -42.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.72% | 108.57% | -69.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASML and HBAR-USD have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASML has higher volatility (17.27%) compared to HBAR-USD (16.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASML dropped -90.00% vs HBAR-USD's -97.58%.
ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASML and HBAR-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer