ASML vs. DUOL
ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) and DUOL (Duolingo, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — ASML in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials, DUOL in Software - Application. Over the past 3 years, ASML returned 36.05%/yr vs -8.86%/yr for DUOL. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ASML vs. DUOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASML achieves a 64.06% return, which is significantly higher than DUOL's -32.79% return.
ASML
- 1D
- 6.54%
- 1M
- 9.86%
- YTD
- 64.06%
- 6M
- 56.76%
- 1Y
- 134.10%
- 3Y*
- 36.05%
- 5Y*
- 21.93%
- 10Y*
- 34.75%
DUOL
- 1D
- 8.19%
- 1M
- 9.23%
- YTD
- -32.79%
- 6M
- -43.27%
- 1Y
- -77.00%
- 3Y*
- -8.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASML vs. DUOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 64.06% | 56.51% | -7.70% | 39.91% | -30.49% | 5.05% |
DUOL Duolingo, Inc. | -32.79% | -45.87% | 42.93% | 218.92% | -32.97% | -23.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASML and DUOL is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2021 | 0.29 |
The correlation between ASML and DUOL shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ASML:
$25.86
DUOL:
$11.67
ASML:
67.64
DUOL:
10.11
ASML:
4.45
DUOL:
0.02
ASML:
20.10
DUOL:
3.89
ASML:
$33.69B
DUOL:
$1.10B
ASML:
$17.72B
DUOL:
$798.46M
ASML:
$12.99B
DUOL:
$167.30M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASML vs. DUOL — Risk / Return Rank
ASML
DUOL
ASML vs. DUOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) and Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASML | DUOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 0.70 | +0.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.56 | -0.94 | +8.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.33 | -1.29 | +21.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASML | DUOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.24 | -1.23 | +4.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | -0.05 | +0.61 |
Drawdowns
ASML vs. DUOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASML drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, which is greater than DUOL's maximum drawdown of -83.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASML and DUOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASML | DUOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.00% | -83.35% | -6.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.85% | -81.92% | +64.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.38% | -83.35% | +37.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -78.18% | +77.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.14% | -35.65% | +7.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | 60.78% | -54.16% |
Volatility
ASML vs. DUOL - Volatility Comparison
ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) and Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) have volatilities of 15.94% and 16.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASML | DUOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.94% | 16.66% | -0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.30% | 41.79% | -8.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.73% | 63.05% | -21.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.23% | 66.32% | -24.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.62% | 66.32% | -27.70% |
Dividends
ASML vs. DUOL - Dividend Comparison
ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, while DUOL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 0.50% | 0.97% | 0.97% | 0.86% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 1.40% | 0.94% | 0.64% | 0.92% | 0.73% |
DUOL Duolingo, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ASML vs. DUOL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ASML Holding N.V. and Duolingo, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ASML vs. DUOL - Profitability Comparison
ASML - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 4.65B and revenue of 8.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.0%.
DUOL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Duolingo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 213.10M and revenue of 291.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.0%.
ASML - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 3.16B and revenue of 8.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.
DUOL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Duolingo, Inc. reported an operating income of 44.53M and revenue of 291.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.
ASML - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.76B and revenue of 8.77B, resulting in a net margin of 31.4%.
DUOL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Duolingo, Inc. reported a net income of 43.46M and revenue of 291.97M, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ASML and DUOL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DUOL has higher volatility (16.66%) compared to ASML (15.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASML dropped -90.00% vs DUOL's -83.35%.
ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs -1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASML and DUOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer