PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASML.AS vs. RHHBY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ASML.AS vs. RHHBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in ASML Holding N.V. (ASML.AS) and Roche Holding AG (RHHBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ASML.AS is traded in EUR, while RHHBY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RHHBY values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASML.AS achieves a 77.49% return, which is significantly higher than RHHBY's 4.82% return. Over the past 10 years, ASML.AS has outperformed RHHBY with an annualized return of 35.87%, while RHHBY has yielded a comparatively lower 7.93% annualized return.


ASML.AS

1D
3.40%
1M
24.72%
YTD
77.49%
6M
76.74%
1Y
147.16%
3Y*
34.95%
5Y*
24.36%
10Y*
35.87%

RHHBY

1D
0.67%
1M
1.60%
YTD
4.82%
6M
7.97%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
11.33%
5Y*
6.08%
10Y*
7.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASML.AS vs. RHHBY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASML.AS
ASML Holding N.V.
77.49%37.08%0.36%36.66%-27.83%78.74%52.10%95.32%-4.67%37.45%
RHHBY
Roche Holding AG
4.82%34.72%6.84%-6.90%-17.39%29.19%0.88%36.49%6.96%0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between ASML.AS and RHHBY is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2007

0.19

The correlation between ASML.AS and RHHBY shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (5 years) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASML.AS vs. RHHBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASML.AS
ASML.AS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ASML.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASML.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASML.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ASML.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASML.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

RHHBY
RHHBY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
RHHBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RHHBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
RHHBY Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
RHHBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
RHHBY Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASML.AS vs. RHHBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML.AS) and Roche Holding AG (RHHBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASML.ASRHHBYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.20

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.87

1.52

+7.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.14

3.62

+19.53

ASML.AS vs. RHHBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASML.AS Sharpe Ratio is 3.47, which is higher than the RHHBY Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASML.AS and RHHBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASML.AS vs. RHHBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASML.AS drawdown since its inception was -56.76%, which is greater than RHHBY's maximum drawdown of -40.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASML.AS and RHHBY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASML.ASRHHBYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.76%

-40.05%

-16.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.81%

-17.95%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.77%

-21.51%

-23.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.93%

-40.05%

-7.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.93%

-40.05%

-7.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.56%

+10.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.83%

-12.28%

-2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.09%

7.66%

-1.57%

Volatility

ASML.AS vs. RHHBY - Volatility Comparison

ASML Holding N.V. (ASML.AS) has a higher volatility of 13.41% compared to Roche Holding AG (RHHBY) at 8.26%. This indicates that ASML.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RHHBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASML.ASRHHBYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.41%

8.26%

+5.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.18%

17.61%

+13.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.46%

26.69%

+13.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.54%

22.53%

+16.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.18%

22.43%

+11.75%

Dividends

ASML.AS vs. RHHBY - Dividend Comparison

ASML.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than RHHBY's 3.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASML.AS
ASML Holding N.V.
0.46%0.71%0.92%0.87%1.28%0.47%0.64%1.19%1.02%0.83%0.98%0.85%
RHHBY
Roche Holding AG
3.00%2.69%3.87%3.55%3.23%1.57%1.66%1.70%3.58%3.25%3.57%2.91%

Financials

ASML.AS vs. RHHBY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ASML Holding N.V. and Roche Holding AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. ASML.AS values in EUR, RHHBY values in CHF

Frequently Asked Questions


ASML.AS and RHHBY have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASML.AS and RHHBY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer