PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASMG vs. MMKT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASMG vs. MMKT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASMG achieves a 176.24% return, which is significantly higher than MMKT's 1.62% return.


ASMG

1D
-0.22%
1M
34.94%
YTD
176.24%
6M
182.30%
1Y
386.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MMKT

1D
0.01%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.62%
6M
1.73%
1Y
3.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMG vs. MMKT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ASMG and MMKT is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASMG vs. MMKT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMG
ASMG Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ASMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASMG Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ASMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

MMKT
MMKT Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MMKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMKT Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MMKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMKT Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMG vs. MMKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASMGMMKTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-12.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-59.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

15.54

-14.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.26

152.72

-141.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.02

913.70

-885.69

ASMG vs. MMKT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASMG Sharpe Ratio is 4.52, which is lower than the MMKT Sharpe Ratio of 16.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASMG and MMKT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASMG vs. MMKT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMG drawdown since its inception was -43.95%, which is greater than MMKT's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMG and MMKT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASMGMMKTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.95%

-0.04%

-43.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.56%

-0.02%

-34.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

0.00%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.91%

-0.00%

-12.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.87%

0.00%

+13.87%

Volatility

ASMG vs. MMKT - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) has a higher volatility of 32.41% compared to Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) at 0.05%. This indicates that ASMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASMGMMKTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.41%

0.05%

+32.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.33%

0.13%

+68.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.22%

0.23%

+85.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.79%

0.23%

+86.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

86.79%

0.23%

+86.56%

ASMG vs. MMKT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MMKT's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASMG vs. MMKT - Dividend Comparison

ASMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, more than MMKT's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ASMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF
4.06%11.20%0.00%
MMKT
Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF
3.71%3.98%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASMG and MMKT have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASMG has higher volatility (32.41%) compared to MMKT (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASMG dropped -43.95% vs MMKT's -0.04%.

On 1-year performance, ASMG leads with 386.21% vs 3.79% for MMKT. On fees, MMKT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, MMKT has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ASMG has performed better with a 386.21% return vs 3.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MMKT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ASMG.

ASMG has the higher dividend yield at 4.06%, compared with 3.71% for MMKT.

ASMG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MMKT is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Texas Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ASMG and 0.20% for MMKT.

MMKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.76 vs 4.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASMG and MMKT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer