PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASMG vs. LABU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ASMG vs. LABU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ASMG vs. LABU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASMG achieves a 40.33% return, which is significantly higher than LABU's 4.20% return.


ASMG

1D
10.26%
1M
-19.89%
YTD
40.33%
6M
61.13%
1Y
199.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LABU

1D
22.31%
1M
-3.83%
YTD
4.20%
6M
78.34%
1Y
175.22%
3Y*
19.86%
5Y*
-36.38%
10Y*
-11.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ASMG vs. LABU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LABU's 1.12% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ASMG vs. LABU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMG
ASMG Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ASMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASMG Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ASMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

LABU
LABU Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
LABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
LABU Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
LABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
LABU Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMG vs. LABU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASMGLABUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

2.04

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.76

2.48

+0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.31

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.48

3.74

+1.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.51

11.90

+2.61

ASMG vs. LABU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASMG Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the LABU Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASMG and LABU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASMGLABUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.04

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

-0.24

+1.45

Correlation

The correlation between ASMG and LABU is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ASMG vs. LABU - Dividend Comparison

ASMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.98%, more than LABU's 0.74% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF
7.98%11.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
0.74%0.84%0.35%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.64%0.17%

Drawdowns

ASMG vs. LABU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMG drawdown since its inception was -43.95%, smaller than the maximum LABU drawdown of -99.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMG and LABU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ASMGLABUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.95%

-99.18%

+55.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.56%

-36.66%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.85%

-96.33%

+68.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.57%

-81.45%

+67.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.05%

12.01%

+1.04%

Volatility

ASMG vs. LABU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) is 30.09%, while Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) has a volatility of 33.99%. This indicates that ASMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LABU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ASMGLABUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.09%

33.99%

-3.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.83%

56.88%

+1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.10%

87.36%

-4.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.32%

95.74%

-13.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.32%

95.91%

-13.59%